2009
DOI: 10.1080/10508420902772777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminatory Referrals: Uncovering a Potential Ethical Dilemma Facing Practitioners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the case illustrates, counselors should not be too quick to refer when faced with value conflicts. Shiles () challenged the assumption that referral is always an appropriate option, expressing concern about “the glorification of referral in the psychological literature” (p. 147). We believe Shiles raised a valid point.…”
Section: Ethical Bracketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the case illustrates, counselors should not be too quick to refer when faced with value conflicts. Shiles () challenged the assumption that referral is always an appropriate option, expressing concern about “the glorification of referral in the psychological literature” (p. 147). We believe Shiles raised a valid point.…”
Section: Ethical Bracketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least two separate lines of scholarly analysis are creating terminology and theory well suited to make this case, especially within a moral framework that is highly sensitized to concerns pertaining to harm. First, the concept of discriminatory referrals is being forwarded as a means of justifying the prohibition of values-based referrals of LGB clients (Bieschke & Mintz, 2012;Shiles, 2009). Based on the nondiscrimination mandates for therapist's work-related activities, Shiles believes it to be unethical to refer the client due to sexual orientation.…”
Section: Scholarly Groundwork For Prohibiting Referral Of Lgb Clientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in an article specifically addressing the ethical issues surrounding referrals based on therapist beliefs systems, Shiles (2009) states that, "As it is currently worded, the either/or language of Standard 2.01 may . .. [provide] ... a potential loophole to allow discriminatory practices in the field of psychology" (p. 147).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%