2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminatory ability of fractal and grey level co-occurrence matrix methods in structural analysis of hippocampus layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the FD did not demonstrate differences between the treatment groups and the injury group, can be associated with the fact of that method is not sensitive to the nuclei on the images. The works using FD and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), for hippocampus, corpus callosum and cingulum analysis (Pantic et al, 2015(Pantic et al, , 2014, GLCM alone or associated with FD had better results than the FD method alone, this improvement was attributed to the ability of the technique to quantify the density of the observed areas. In our findings, the extent of the injury area was smaller in the treated groups, resulting in denser inflammatory infiltrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the FD did not demonstrate differences between the treatment groups and the injury group, can be associated with the fact of that method is not sensitive to the nuclei on the images. The works using FD and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), for hippocampus, corpus callosum and cingulum analysis (Pantic et al, 2015(Pantic et al, , 2014, GLCM alone or associated with FD had better results than the FD method alone, this improvement was attributed to the ability of the technique to quantify the density of the observed areas. In our findings, the extent of the injury area was smaller in the treated groups, resulting in denser inflammatory infiltrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractal analysis was done in FracLac (developed by A. Karperien, Charles Sturt University, Australia) (Karperien, –2007), a plugin of ImageJ software of the National Institutes of Health, (Bethesda, MD, USA) using conventional box‐counting method. For the details on this mathematical method, the reader is referred to our previously published works (Pantic et al ., ; Pantic et al ., ,b). Briefly, the nuclei were selected in ImageJ using freehand selection option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analiza regiona od interesa je obavljena direktno sa mikrografa bez dodatne obrade poput kropovanja/ segmentovanja. Pojedinosti vezane za formiranje i obradu mikrografa (7,8) su prethodno objavljene.…”
Section: Materijal I Metode Protokol I Felgen Bojenjeunclassified
“…Teksturalni parametri su izračunati na sličan način kao u prethodno publikovanim radovima (7,8,10). GLCM analiza jedara je urađena korišćenjem programa za ImageJ u okviru MATLAB softverskog koda (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA).…”
Section: Materijal I Metode Protokol I Felgen Bojenjeunclassified