2020
DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.673143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminatiοn of Irοn Deposits Using Feature Οriented Principal Cοmpοnent Selectiοn and Band Ratiο Methοds: Eastern Taurus /Turkey

Abstract: International Symposium on Applied Geoinformatics (ISAG2019) was held in Istanbul on 7-9 November 2019. The symposium is organized with the aim of promoting the advancements to explore the latest scientific and technological developments and opportunities in the field of Geoinformatics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retrieval of soil surface parameters from SAR data normally can be realized using the backscattering model that presents the relation between the target parameters (soil moisture and International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8(1): 065-077 (2021) Research Article How to cite: Sutariya et al, (2021 Soil Moisture Estimation using Sentinel-1 SAR data and Land Surface Temperature in Panchmahal district, Gujarat State, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 8(1):065-077. doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.777434 roughness) and the SAR sensor configurations such as incidence angle, polarization, and frequency (Sahebi et al, 2002). The backscattered SAR signal is affected strongly from soil moisture and surface roughness on bare soil (Ulaby, Moore, and Fung, 1986;Zribi et al, 2007). For bare soils, different theoretical and empirical approaches have been developed and many approaches assumed that there is a linear behaviour between surface soil moisture and SAR backscattering coefficient (sigmanought:σ0) (Esetlili and Kurucu, 2016;Esetlili et al, 2018;Gao, Zribi, Escorihuela, and Baghdadi, 2017;Zribi, Baghdadi, Holah, and Fafin, 2005).…”
Section: Microwave Remote Sensing For Soil Moisture Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Retrieval of soil surface parameters from SAR data normally can be realized using the backscattering model that presents the relation between the target parameters (soil moisture and International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8(1): 065-077 (2021) Research Article How to cite: Sutariya et al, (2021 Soil Moisture Estimation using Sentinel-1 SAR data and Land Surface Temperature in Panchmahal district, Gujarat State, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 8(1):065-077. doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.777434 roughness) and the SAR sensor configurations such as incidence angle, polarization, and frequency (Sahebi et al, 2002). The backscattered SAR signal is affected strongly from soil moisture and surface roughness on bare soil (Ulaby, Moore, and Fung, 1986;Zribi et al, 2007). For bare soils, different theoretical and empirical approaches have been developed and many approaches assumed that there is a linear behaviour between surface soil moisture and SAR backscattering coefficient (sigmanought:σ0) (Esetlili and Kurucu, 2016;Esetlili et al, 2018;Gao, Zribi, Escorihuela, and Baghdadi, 2017;Zribi, Baghdadi, Holah, and Fafin, 2005).…”
Section: Microwave Remote Sensing For Soil Moisture Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeng et al, 2004 proposed a method to retrieve SMC based on the integration of LST and NDVI called Triangle method. LST is determined from thermal emission, and NDVI is estimated based on surface reflectance of red and the near infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, so these methods sometimes are termed as optical, thermal infrared remote sensing (Amato et al, 2015;Rahimzadeh-Bajgiran et al, 2013;Traore et al, 2020).…”
Section: Multi-sensor Fusion For Soil Moisture Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, iron oxides BRs 3/1 and 4/2 for Landsat TM/ETM+ and OLI8, respectively, were applied in order to highlight iron oxides by the presence of bright pixels (Sabins, 1999). The iron oxides BR is useful for detecting ferric iron (Fe 3+ ) oxides such as hematite and goethite (Imbroane et al, 2007;Hung, 2013;Pour et al, 2019;Rockwell, 2013;Soe et al, 2005;Traore et al, 2020). At second, the BRs 5/7 and 6/7 for Landsat TM/ETM+ and OLI8, respectively, were applied in order to highlight hydroxyl-bearing minerals such as clay minerals (kaolinite, montmorillonite and alunite) by the presence of bright pixels (Clark, 1999;Hung, 2013;Imbroane et al, 2007;Sabins, 1999;Soe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Spectral Band Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this spectral library, the multispectral bands (1, 3, 4, and 5) and (2, 4, 5, and 6) were used for TM-ETM+ and OLI/ TIRS, respectively, to highlight the spectral response of iron oxides. The multispectral bands (1, 4, 5, and 7) and (2, 5, 6, and 7) were used for TM-ETM+ and OLI/TIRS, respectively, to enhance hydroxyl-bearing minerals (Osinowo et al, 2021;Pour et al, 2019;Traore et al, 2020). The resulting PCs images could then show targeted surface types such as rocks, waste, soils, villages/settlements by highlighting them as bright or dark pixels, depending on their respective (positive/negative) eigenvector magnitudes and signs (Boateng et al, 2018;Kujjo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Feature Oriented Principal Component Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, TIR satellite sensors have low temporal, spatial, and spectral resolutions, and the spectral responses in these bands may contain a mixture of features [11]. Vegetation or soil cover may cause high variation in granite spectral response, making it challenging to map the deposits [4,12]. High-spatial-resolution SWIR bands show spectral absorption for different granite compositions (e.g., muscovite and epidote) and calcite in 2.2 µm regions; a complete absorption is only observed for calcite near the 2.3 µm regions [4,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%