Discriminative Validity of the Danish Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

Stahlhut, Michelle; Gard, Gunvor; Aadahl, Mette; Christensen, Jette

doi:10.3109/01942638.2010.486824

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Over the past 20 years, the PEDI has been widely used in both clinical practice and research (Berg et al, 2008;Berg, Fräslie, & Hussain, 2003;Chen et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2010;Custers, Hoijtink, van der Net, & Helders, 2000;Custers, Wassenberg-Severijnen, Hoijtink, Vermeer, & Helders, 2003;Erkin et al, 2007;Gannotti & Cruz, 2001;Groleger, Vidmar, & Zupan, 2005;Mancini, 2005;Nordmark, Orban, Hägglund, & Jarnlo, 1999;Stahlhut et al, 2010;Stahlhut, Gard, Aadahl, & Christensen, 2011).…”

Section: Evidence Of Cross-cultural Validity Of the Pedimentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)

Schulze¹,

Kottorp²,

Meichtry³

et al. 2014

Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Activities of daily living (ADL) of children are widely assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory (PEDI). This study examined test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the German PEDI (PEDI-G). During the adaptation of the PEDI nine items were added. In total, 117 parents of 53 children without and 64 children with a diagnosed physical disability from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland participated. Reliability was examined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) for the Functional Skill Scale with and without added items and the Caregiver Assistance Scale. Cohen`s Kappa was used to calculate the reliability of the Modification Scale. All ICC's for test-retest and inter-rater reliability were above 0.75, indicating good to very good reliability. The SDD varied from 0.83-5.58 across PEDI domains and scales. For the Modification Scale, Cohen's weighted kappa varied from 0.25 to 1.00 indicating sufficient reliability for some but not all items. Our findings indicate that the Functional Skill Scale and the Caregiver Assistance Scale of the PEDI-G are reliable scales that can be used to evaluate ADLs of children with and without physical disability.

show abstract

Section: Evidence Of Cross-cultural Validity Of the Pedimentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)

Schulze¹,

Kottorp²,

Meichtry³

et al. 2014

Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An assessment tool for Africa must take into account whether children are living in urban or rural areas as well as their socio‐economic circumstances. The PEDI was earlier adapted and validated for several non‐American cultures (Al‐Khudair & Al‐Eisa, ; Berg, Aamodt, Stanghelle, Krumlinde‐Sundholm, & Hussain, ; Chen, Hsieh, Sheu, Hu, & Tseng, ; Erkin, Elhan, Aybay, Sirzai, & Ozel, ; Stahlhut, Gard, Aadahl, & Christensen, ); however, there is no published version adapted to any African country. Our purpose was accordingly to develop a version of PEDI culturally relevant to Uganda.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Uganda version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Part I: Cross‐cultural adaptation

Kakooza‐Mwesige

Tumwine

Forssberg

et al. 2018

Child

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Mobility Scale of the original Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory evaluates the child’s functional mobility in everyday activities with regard to functional skills and amount of caregiver assistance [ 38 ]. A Danish version will be applied as a parental questionnaire: The content and discriminative validity have been established in children with CP [ 39 , 40 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of instrumented gait analysis for individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial protocol

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundChildren with cerebral palsy (CP) often have an altered gait. Orthopaedic surgery, spasticity management, physical therapy and orthotics are used to improve the gait. Interventions are individually tailored and are planned on the basis of clinical examinations and standardised measurements to assess walking (‘care as usual’). However, these measurements do not describe features in the gait that reflect underlying neuro-musculoskeletal impairments. This can be done with 3-dimensional instrumented gait analysis (IGA). The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that improvements in gait following individually tailored interventions when IGA is used are superior to those following ‘care as usual’.Methods/DesignA prospective, single blind, randomised, parallel group study will be conducted. Children aged 5 to 8 years with spastic CP, classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II, will be included. The interventions under investigation are: 1) individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions based on the use of IGA, and 2) ‘care as usual’. The primary outcome is gait measured by the Gait Deviation Index. Secondary outcome measures are: walking performance (1-min walk test) and patient-reported outcomes of functional mobility (Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory), health-related quality of life (The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cerebral Palsy Module) and overall health, pain and participation (The Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument). The primary endpoint for assessing the outcome of the two interventions will be 52 weeks after start of intervention. A follow up will also be performed at 26 weeks; however, exclusively for the patient-reported outcomes.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of an individually tailored interdisciplinary intervention based on the use of IGA versus ‘care as usual’ in children with CP. Consequently, the study will provide novel evidence for the use of IGA.Trial registrationTrial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02160457. Registered June 2, 2014.

show abstract

Discriminative Validity of the Danish Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

Cited by 11 publications

References 32 publications

Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)

Inter-Rater and Test–Retest Reliability of the German Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-G)

The Uganda version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Part I: Cross‐cultural adaptation

The use of instrumented gait analysis for individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About