2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000062742.29158.6e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative-Stimulus Effects of Triazolam in Light and Moderate Drinkers

Abstract: Future studies should examine the discriminative-stimulus effects of a lower dose of triazolam (e.g., 0.25 mg) in light and moderate drinks or use a fading procedure to determine differences in terms of the lowest discriminable dose.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak behavioral effects of 0.25 mg/70 kg triazolam occurred between 1.5 and 2.5 h post-dose, which is consistent with previous reports (e.g., Simpson and Rush 2002; Rush et al 2003). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Peak behavioral effects of 0.25 mg/70 kg triazolam occurred between 1.5 and 2.5 h post-dose, which is consistent with previous reports (e.g., Simpson and Rush 2002; Rush et al 2003). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with previous studies, triazolam alone engendered a broad range of sedative-like performance impairment and self-reported effects, with peak effects occurring 60 to 90 minutes post dose (Greenblatt et al, 2005; Babalonis et al, 2008; Rush et al, 2003; Simpson & Rush, 2002; Rush & Ali, 1999). Progesterone alone also produced small magnitude increases in sedative-like measures with a similar time course.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, choice of diazepam differed as a function of drinking status in both studies (i.e., in both of these studies, moderate drinkers self-administered diazepam significantly more than light drinkers). The results of a previous study conducted in our laboratory, by contrast, suggest that moderate and light drinkers are not differentially sensitive to the discriminative-stimulus effects of triazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine hypnotic (Rush et al, 2003). In this study, six light drinkers and six moderate drinkers were taught to discriminate 0.375 mg of triazolam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although our findings that light and moderate drinkers respond differentially to the effects of d-amphetamine are provocative, they should be viewed cautiously. As reviewed previously, the results of previous studies that compared the acute behavioral effects of other commonly abused drugs (including ethanol, benzodiazepines, and inhaled anesthetics) in light and moderate drinkers are mixed both within and across laboratories (Cho et al, 1997;de Wit et al, 1989;de Wit and Doty, 1994;Rush et al, 2003;Walker and Zacny, 2001). Future studies should attempt to replicate the results of this experiment and compare the effects of d-amphetamine under other behavioral arrangements (e.g., drug self-administration and discrimination) in light and moderate drinkers.…”
Section: Effects Of Commonly Abused Drugs In Individuals With Differementioning
confidence: 92%