2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2014.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative Deep Metric Learning for Face Verification in the Wild

Abstract: This paper presents a new discriminative deep metric learning (DDML) method for face verification in the wild. Different from existing metric learning-based face verification methods which aim to learn a Mahalanobis distance metric to maximize the inter-class variations and minimize the intra-class variations, simultaneously, the proposed D-DML trains a deep neural network which learns a set of hierarchical nonlinear transformations to project face pairsinto the same feature subspace, under which the distance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
370
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 607 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
370
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a test pair, we first extract the bag-level feature and then use the trained SVM to classify. For video-based face verification on the YTF dataset, we compare our method MILDIS with the several existing methods, including LM3L [18], DDML(LBP) [19], DDML(combined) [19], EigenPEP [20], DeepFace-single [3] and DeepID2+ [21]. The recognition accuracies and standard deviations of different methods are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given a test pair, we first extract the bag-level feature and then use the trained SVM to classify. For video-based face verification on the YTF dataset, we compare our method MILDIS with the several existing methods, including LM3L [18], DDML(LBP) [19], DDML(combined) [19], EigenPEP [20], DeepFace-single [3] and DeepID2+ [21]. The recognition accuracies and standard deviations of different methods are reported in Table 2.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this table, out method achieves the state-of-the-art performances on the YTF dataset. [18] 81.3±1.2 DDML(LBP) [19] 81.3±1.6 DDML(combined) [19] 82.3±1.5 EigenPEP [20] 84.8±1.4 DeepFace-single [8] 91.4±1.1 DeepID2+ [21] 93.2±0.2 MILDIS 92.8±1.4…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been proposed in the literature that essentially exploit the label information from face images or face pairs. For instance, Hu et al [11] learn a discriminative metric within the deep neural network framework. Weinberger et al [9] propose Large Margin Nearest Neighbor (LMNN) metric which enforces the large margin constraint among all triplets of labeled training data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Yih et al [17] apply SFNNs to learn similarities on text data, Bordes et al [18] on entities in Knowledge Bases, and Masci et al [19] on multi-modal data. Other works on face verification use MLP Siamese architectures [20,21] or Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM) [22] to learn a non-linear similarity metric. 80 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%