2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2019.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminative and convergent validity of strain elastography for detecting tendinopathy within the supraspinatus tendon: a cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, changes in tendon structure after a training intervention of short-term duration are often minimal, and SEL therefore may not be able to measure these tendon changes. Although SEL has been shown to have satisfactory reliability 4 , 32 as well as validity 3 , 23 , 32 in both patients with and patients without supraspinatus tendinopathy, SEL may not yet have the capability to detect changes over a short time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, changes in tendon structure after a training intervention of short-term duration are often minimal, and SEL therefore may not be able to measure these tendon changes. Although SEL has been shown to have satisfactory reliability 4 , 32 as well as validity 3 , 23 , 32 in both patients with and patients without supraspinatus tendinopathy, SEL may not yet have the capability to detect changes over a short time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of the study are its use of reliable 4 and valid 3 SEL and PROM methods, in addition to the use of 2 different quantitative variables (ratio and RAW), not previously reported in a longitudinal study of SEL of the supraspinatus tendon. The performances of the blinded measurements using SEL, MRI scans, and US are further strengths of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validity of SEL in the supraspinatus tendon has been shown [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], as has its ability to detect changes in the elasticity of both the supraspinatus tendon and muscle in participants who are healthy [ 7 , 16 ]. Current research shows the supraspinatus tendon elasticity to be around 3.75 in healthy subjects, 3.8 in healthy sports populations and 3.55 in subjects with supraspinatus tendinopathy [ 7 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. To date, laboratory studies have shown promising effects, but there is an important need to increase knowledge about these interventions in order to extrapolate results to clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only RAW and DELT were able to discriminate significantly between patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy and healthy shoulder controls (adjusted for sex and BMI). Only RAW, MRI and DASH were statistically and significantly associated (adjusted for sex and BMI), meaning that patients with MRI-verified tendinopathy and/or increased disability had softer tendons [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%