2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-020-00801-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Tourette Syndrome Based on the Spatial Patterns of the Resting–State EEG Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study looked at monozygotic twins with TS and found the more severely affected twin to have more fronto-central theta activity [ 106 ]. Another study has also shown that there is reduced long range connectivity between the frontal and temporal/occipital/parietal lobes in patients with TS compared to healthy controls, which mirrors results in fMRI studies [ 107 , 108 ]. It is hypothesized that dysrhythmic thalamo-cortical oscillations may lead to a loss of neuronal control over movements and lead to tics [ 109 ].…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…One study looked at monozygotic twins with TS and found the more severely affected twin to have more fronto-central theta activity [ 106 ]. Another study has also shown that there is reduced long range connectivity between the frontal and temporal/occipital/parietal lobes in patients with TS compared to healthy controls, which mirrors results in fMRI studies [ 107 , 108 ]. It is hypothesized that dysrhythmic thalamo-cortical oscillations may lead to a loss of neuronal control over movements and lead to tics [ 109 ].…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As clarified in previous studies, the increasing pairs of SPN filters might facilitate the classification of situations of interest [44,45]; for example, different pairs of SPN features (i.e., 1 pair, 2 pairs, and 3 pairs) have been used to achieve the classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures from epilepsy, and 3 pairs of SPN features achieved the highest classification accuracy [45]. Consistent with the protocols used in previous studies [46,47], in our present study, three pairs of SPN filters were accordingly adopted to achieve the classification of responders and non-responders. In particular, for a 21 × 21 adjacency matrix, M, each SPN filter was a 21-length vector, and therefore, three pairs of SPN filters comprised a 21×6 matrix.…”
Section: ) Discrimination Of Responders From Non-responders Based On ...supporting
confidence: 58%
“…To fill in this gap, we had additionally developed a new feature extraction approach for brain network, namely, spatial pattern of the network (SPN), to extract spatial pattern features contained in a given brain network [43], [44]. As proved in the previous studies [45], [46], SPN advantages in estimating the corresponding spatial network filters by enhancing the nodes that have strong connectivity with large values, while compressing those having weak connections with rather small values (closing to zero) [39].…”
Section: Prediction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%