2017
DOI: 10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of the Effects of Doxorubicin on Two Different Breast Cancer Cell Lines on Account of Multidrug Resistance and Apoptosis

Abstract: Oncul and Ercan: Difference of Breast Cancer Cells Regarding Apoptosis and MDRBreast cancer is one of the most common cancer types and malfunctioning proteins in apoptotic pathways are known to be the main contributors of cancer development. In this study MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines were treated with a potent chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin. IC 50 values were calculated to be 8306 and 6602 nM, respectively. Percentage of the cells in cell cycle arrest increased in a dose-dependent manner … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggested that cell cycle arrest is predominantly induced at the G2/M checkpoint in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with doxorubicin or gefitinib for 24 h, although the effect was more evident in gefitinib. Similar results were also reported in previous studies, where MDA-MB-231 cells accumulated largely in the G2/M phase due to reduced expression of CDK1, CDK2, and cyclin-B1 (Oncul and Ercan, 2017;Wei et al, 2020). A significant increase in a sub-G1 fraction was observed in the cells treated with gefitinib for 24 h compared with control (22.8 and 2%, respectively), and maximum at 48 h (55.1 and 1.7%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results suggested that cell cycle arrest is predominantly induced at the G2/M checkpoint in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with doxorubicin or gefitinib for 24 h, although the effect was more evident in gefitinib. Similar results were also reported in previous studies, where MDA-MB-231 cells accumulated largely in the G2/M phase due to reduced expression of CDK1, CDK2, and cyclin-B1 (Oncul and Ercan, 2017;Wei et al, 2020). A significant increase in a sub-G1 fraction was observed in the cells treated with gefitinib for 24 h compared with control (22.8 and 2%, respectively), and maximum at 48 h (55.1 and 1.7%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both MDA-MB-231 [79] and MCF-7 [78] cell lines have shown the ability to gain resistance to doxorubicin. Nevertheless, the opposite can happen and some studies have shown a lower IC 50 for DOX in MDA-MB-231 than in MCF-7 cells [80,81]. Different rates of nanoparticles uptake, depending on cell type, may also be at play to explain this.…”
Section: Antiproliferative and Cytotoxicity In Vitro Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results thus show the potential of the hybrid nanoparticles as a novel anticancer drug delivery system. lower IC50 for DOX in MDA-MB-231 than in MCF-7 cells [80,81]. Different rates of nanoparticles uptake, depending on cell type, may also be at play to explain this.…”
Section: Antiproliferative and Cytotoxicity In Vitro Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cycle arrest was evident in both G0/G1 and G2/M phases in MCF-7 cells, while it was most prominent in G2/M phase in MDA-MB-231 cells. Oncul and co-workers obtained similar results when Dox was used in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells to study multidrug resistance and apoptosis [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%