2015 International Conference on Electrical &Amp; Electronic Engineering (ICEEE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ceee.2015.7428297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of scalp EEG signals in wavelet transform domain and channel selection for the patient-invariant seizure detection

Abstract: In this paper, a statistical method of classifying Electroencephalogram(EEG) data for automatic detection of epileptic seizure is carried out using a publicly available scalp EEG database. The classification is carried out to distinguish the seizure segments from the non-seizure ones. The higher order moments (specifically variance) have been calculated in various sub-bands in the wavelet transform domain and utilized as the discriminating feature in the Support Vector Machine(SVM) classifier. The method is te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On comparing these results with those reported in [51], in case of reduced montage of 10 channels, our algorithm detects all the seizures in these 6 patients correctly where each patient has FP/hr < 0.2. Also, our proposed method shows comparable (or better) performance relative to the performance of methods such as [47]- [49] when the number of channels and the selected patients are almost the same. Most importantly, there is no significant loss in performance caused by spatial restriction and reduction in number of electrodes.…”
Section: E Comparison Of Results Between 23 Patients and 22 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On comparing these results with those reported in [51], in case of reduced montage of 10 channels, our algorithm detects all the seizures in these 6 patients correctly where each patient has FP/hr < 0.2. Also, our proposed method shows comparable (or better) performance relative to the performance of methods such as [47]- [49] when the number of channels and the selected patients are almost the same. Most importantly, there is no significant loss in performance caused by spatial restriction and reduction in number of electrodes.…”
Section: E Comparison Of Results Between 23 Patients and 22 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For reduced number of channels, 75 different montages involving 3, 4, 5 or 6 channels were successively adopted, and the success rate for the best combination of channels (maximum up to 6 channels) reached to 85%. Some recent works [47]- [49] also considered the topic of channel selection and presented the performance results using CHB-MIT dataset. A summary of the performance comparison of these methods with the proposed method is given in Table 6.…”
Section: E Comparison Of Results Between 23 Patients and 22 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A rst distinction between the approaches is the specic domain of the EEG data on which they have focused: Time series, frequency data, or spectro-temporal signals (Ahmad et al, 2015;Das et al, 2015). Another signicant dierence is the set of features which each method obtained in its analysis: Some studies utilized statistical, chaos theory, or information theory parameters (Ahmad et al, 2015;Das et al, 2015;Gill et al, 2015), while other eorts applied data transformations such as singular value decomposition (SVD) or principal components analysis (PCA) (Zhao et al, 2016). A third prominent divergence among the previously proposed methods is the level of articial intelligence dependency to perform a decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%