2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cbms.2017.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Preictal and Interictal Brain States from Long-Term EEG Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This duration was determined since it is highly important to give an effective time for the physician to intervene in the patient before the seizure onset [16]. Moreover, the preictal interval is an arbitrary choice of investigators since there is no precise time limit for the preictal state [2]. Therefore, in this study, the preictal window of 30 min was chosen.…”
Section: Eeg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This duration was determined since it is highly important to give an effective time for the physician to intervene in the patient before the seizure onset [16]. Moreover, the preictal interval is an arbitrary choice of investigators since there is no precise time limit for the preictal state [2]. Therefore, in this study, the preictal window of 30 min was chosen.…”
Section: Eeg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were various seizures that occurred over a short interval in the CHB-MIT EEG data set, of which the seizure that occurred first was included in the analysis There were 20 cases that fulfilled the inclusion criteria (see Table 1). The time periods other than the preictal, ictal, and postictal periods were accepted as interictal, which occurred at least two hours away from the seizure [2]. In addition, segments were chosen as non-overlapping 5 sec as in the study [2].…”
Section: Eeg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations