Discrimination of Isointense Bitter Stimuli in a Beer Model System

Abstract

Prior work suggests humans can differentiate between bitter stimuli in water. Here, we describe three experiments that test whether beer consumers can discriminate between different bitterants in beer. In Experiment 1 (n = 51), stimuli were intensity matched; Experiments 2 and 3 were a difference from control (DFC)/check-all-that-apply (CATA) test (n = 62), and an affective test (n = 81). All used a commercial non-alcoholic beer spiked with Isolone (a hop extract), quinine sulfate dihydrate, and sucrose octaacetate (SOA). In Experiment 1, participants rated intensities on general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS), which were analyzed via ANOVA. In Experiment 2, participants rated how different samples were from a reference of Isolone on a 7-point DFC scale, and endorsed 13 attributes in a CATA task. DFC data were analyzed via ANOVA with Dunnett’s test to compare differences relative to a blind reference, and CATA data were analyzed via Cochran’s Q test. In Experiment 3, liking was assessed on labeled affective magnitude scales, and samples were also ranked. Liking was analyzed via ANOVA and rankings were analyzed with a Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. Experiment 1 confirmed that samples were isointense. In Experiment 2, despite being isointense, both quinine (p = 0.04) and SOA (p = 0.03) were different from Isolone, but no significant effects were found for CATA descriptors (all p values > 0.16). In Experiment 3, neither liking (p = 0.16) or ranking (p = 0.49) differed. Collectively, these data confirm that individuals can discriminate perceptually distinct bitter stimuli in beer, as shown previously in water, but these differences cannot be described semantically, and they do not seem to influence hedonic assessments.

The gastrointestinal tract in hunger and satiety signalling

“…Nowadays, the bitter flavour has gained more appreciation, is part of our daily diet, being present in cabbages, coffee, tea and as food additives, and also has hedonic qualities 57 ,. 58 Taking into account the existence of 25 different bitter taste receptors in man, this offers multiple opportunities but also a high level of complexity. Additional studies will be required to select suitable ligands.…”

Synergistic and antagonistic ingredient interactions as a sugar reduction strategy in chocolate milk

“…Also, the concentration of vanillin used in the Isogai and Wise study was much greater than the concentration used in this experiment (1.1% vs. 0.008%-0.033%). Last, the bitterness of SOA may differ from the one of cocoa powder, as recent research has demonstrated perceptual differences among bitter stimuli at equal bitter intensity (Higgins & Hayes, 2020). Here we found that vanillin odor showing signs of reducing the bitterness of SOA in aqueous solutions does not generalize to vanillin's effect of reducing the bitterness of cocoa powder in fluid milk, at least at the concentrations relevant to commercial formulation.…”

Melaleuca armillaris essential oil as an odor reducer in intestinal ostomy bags: a semi-experimental study

“…The intensity of the odor of the effluents in the collection bag was evaluated by the patients and their informal caregivers using the Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS) two hours after application of the product. The LMS is a semantic perceptual intensity scale, characterized by intensity labels: -Hardly Perceived; -Weak; -Moderate; -Strong; -Very Strong and -The Strongest Possible (21) . In order to carry out this study, this scale was adapted to the odor of the effluents in the bags of colostomized patients.…”