2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182010000739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of fish populations using parasites: Random Forests on a ‘predictable’ host-parasite system

Abstract: We address the effect of spatial scale and temporal variation on model generality when forming predictive models for fish assignment using a new data mining approach, Random Forests (RF), to variable biological markers (parasite community data). Models were implemented for a fish host-parasite system sampled along the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts of Spain and were validated using independent datasets. We considered 2 basic classification problems in evaluating the importance of variations in parasite infr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Otros comparan las comunidades de parásitos (ya sea infracomunidades o comunidades componentes) entre zonas en estudio, sin hacer distinción por el tipo de parásito (e.g., Lester & MacKenzie 2009 para una crítica). Además, entre estos últimos hay variedad de métodos empleados para el análisis de los datos, que motiva discusión (Perdiguero-Alonso et al 2008, Pérez-del-Olmo et al 2010. Ciertamente, los estudios parasitológicos que disponen información adicional de los hospedadores (morfometría, microquímica de otolitos, genética) son más completos pero no necesariamente más explicativos .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Otros comparan las comunidades de parásitos (ya sea infracomunidades o comunidades componentes) entre zonas en estudio, sin hacer distinción por el tipo de parásito (e.g., Lester & MacKenzie 2009 para una crítica). Además, entre estos últimos hay variedad de métodos empleados para el análisis de los datos, que motiva discusión (Perdiguero-Alonso et al 2008, Pérez-del-Olmo et al 2010. Ciertamente, los estudios parasitológicos que disponen información adicional de los hospedadores (morfometría, microquímica de otolitos, genética) son más completos pero no necesariamente más explicativos .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…We selected RF instead of other available methods because of its: (1) easy usage and powerful ability that outperforms other classifiers; (2) no requirement of distributional assumption and independence of the predictor variables; (3) no overfitting [15].…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few efforts have been put into the improvement of classification methods, whereas machine-learning methods (e.g. random forests, artificial neural networks) have been applied in fish parasites and otolith microchemistry, and have outperformed discriminant analysis [13][14][15]. Discriminant analysis (linear, quadratic and canonical) is commonly used in population studies based on otolith shape, and multivariate normality and independence of the predictor variables are required for this method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Pérez-del-Olmo et al . (2010), each data set was randomly split into a training dataset (80% of observations) and an independent validation dataset (20% of observations). The configuration for building RF models included 500 trees and default number of a randomly selected set of predictor variables (square root of the total number of predictor variables).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008; Pérez-del-Olmo et al . 2010). We believe that these studies are the only examples of the application of RF to parasitological data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%