2014
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.2991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of breast microcalcifications using a strain-compounding technique with ultrasound speckle factor imaging

Abstract: The usefulness of breast ultrasound could be extended by improving the detection of microcalcifications by being able to detect and enhance microcalcifications while simultaneously eliminating hyperechoic spots (e.g., speckle noise and fibrocystic changes) that can be mistaken for microcalcifications (i.e., false microcalcifications). This study investigated the use of a strain-compounding technique with speckle factor (SF) imaging to analyze the degree of scatterer redistributions in breast tissues under stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combination of CFAR and straincompounding technique, MicroPure was able to effectively reduce speckles and elevate signal-noise ratio (SNR) to a higher level. Similarly, high-frequency ultrasound whose spatial resolution is less than 1 mm can easily make out micro-calcifications against background signals in ex vivo specimen (36)(37)(38). However, these experimental techniques await for further evidence.…”
Section: Conventional Imaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combination of CFAR and straincompounding technique, MicroPure was able to effectively reduce speckles and elevate signal-noise ratio (SNR) to a higher level. Similarly, high-frequency ultrasound whose spatial resolution is less than 1 mm can easily make out micro-calcifications against background signals in ex vivo specimen (36)(37)(38). However, these experimental techniques await for further evidence.…”
Section: Conventional Imaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray-based imaging is considered to be generally more effective than other imaging modalities for breast cancer screening and detection because it is able to visualize microcalcifications more consistently than other methods. For example, microcalcificiation conspicuity in ultrasound is degraded by speckle noise, 1 and MRI for breast imaging relies on enhancement using contrast agents that do not exhibit uptake by microcalcifications. 2 However, conventional x-ray imaging is limited by the low contrast of ∼3% 3 between the x-ray linear attenuation coefficients of healthy and diseased breast tissues at mammography energies (∼20 keV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%