2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ay01351a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of adulterants in UHT milk samples by NIRS coupled with supervision discrimination techniques

Abstract: A methodology was developed for distinguishing different ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk adulterants (water, urea, and formaldehyde) at various levels using NIR spectroscopy (NIRS) coupled with supervision discrimination techniques (SIMCA, SVM-DA, and PLS-DA).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is considered a soft method because a sample can be classified into a class or not assigned to any class and it can be extended for multiple dimensions, in case that more than two classes were modelled. The outcomes for SIMCA model (as the same way of PLS-DA) are the samples assignments to each class for both calibration and validation steps (Berrueta et al, 2007;Luna, Pinho, & Machado, 2016). In a similar way used in PLS-DA, the number of components (N) was selected by a previous cross validation error approach, in which the algorithm was run with a variable number of components (from 1 to 20) and the number of components with minimum validation error was selected for each class.…”
Section: Soft Independent Modelling Class Analogy (Simca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is considered a soft method because a sample can be classified into a class or not assigned to any class and it can be extended for multiple dimensions, in case that more than two classes were modelled. The outcomes for SIMCA model (as the same way of PLS-DA) are the samples assignments to each class for both calibration and validation steps (Berrueta et al, 2007;Luna, Pinho, & Machado, 2016). In a similar way used in PLS-DA, the number of components (N) was selected by a previous cross validation error approach, in which the algorithm was run with a variable number of components (from 1 to 20) and the number of components with minimum validation error was selected for each class.…”
Section: Soft Independent Modelling Class Analogy (Simca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACC, NER and ER are considered global parameters giving information of the overall classification for each algorithm step (calibration or validation). NER and ACC parameters take values from 0 to 1, indicating a perfect classification when the values are 1(Ballabio, Grisoni, & Todeschini, 2018;Luna et al, 2016).Another analysis to visualize the relation between SEN and SPEC is Receiver OperatingCharacteristic curves (ROC curves). The first ROC curve shows a plot of SEN and SPEC values varying the threshold limit (boundary limits of the classes), where the optimal threshold is the value showing the highest SEN and SPEC values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil klasifikasi kopi Codot murni dan campuran dinyatakan dalam bentuk matriks konfusi, seperti yang disajikan di Tabel 2 (Cheah & Fang 2020) Berdasarkan matriks konfusi tersebut dapat dihitung empat parameter berikut, yaitu sensitivitas (SEN), spesifisitas (SPEC), presisi (PREC), dan akurasi (ACC) dengan rentang nilai antara 0100% yang dihitung dengan persamaan 1 sampai 4 sebagai berikut (Luna et al 2016):…”
Section: Metode Kemometrika Untuk Uji Keaslian Kopi Codot Lampungunclassified
“…The so-called Coomans plot, showing the distances for each sample and the boundaries is obtained and a sample could be either included into a class or even not assigned to any class. For this reason, SIMCA is considered a soft model (Vanden Branden and Hubert 2005;Luna et al 2016). Moreover, a confusion matrix is calculated based on the number of well and misclassified samples.…”
Section: Soft Independent Modelling Class Analogy (Simca)mentioning
confidence: 99%