2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9071505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination between Modal, Breathy and Pressed Voice for Single Vowels Using Neck-Surface Vibration Signals

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using neck-surface acceleration signals to discriminate between modal, breathy and pressed voice. Voice data for five English single vowels were collected from 31 female native Canadian English speakers using a portable Neck Surface Accelerometer (NSA) and a condenser microphone. Firstly, auditory-perceptual ratings were conducted by five clinically-certificated Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) to categorize voice type using the audio recording… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to work by Lei, Kennedy, Fasanella, Li-Jessen, and Mongeau (2019), the intent of eliciting the nonmodal phonatory conditions was not to obtain pure examples of breathy, strained, and rough qualities but rather to elicit a variety of voice conditions that might influence the relationship between Ps and ACC signal magnitude. Even so, to validate that the elicited productions represented different modes of phonation and that they were categorized into the expected auditory-perceptual categories, a second voicespecialized speech-language pathologist independently rated randomized trials of each elicited phonatory and pitch condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to work by Lei, Kennedy, Fasanella, Li-Jessen, and Mongeau (2019), the intent of eliciting the nonmodal phonatory conditions was not to obtain pure examples of breathy, strained, and rough qualities but rather to elicit a variety of voice conditions that might influence the relationship between Ps and ACC signal magnitude. Even so, to validate that the elicited productions represented different modes of phonation and that they were categorized into the expected auditory-perceptual categories, a second voicespecialized speech-language pathologist independently rated randomized trials of each elicited phonatory and pitch condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were seated in front of a microphone, and wore a neck surface accelerometer (NSA) mounted using adhesive (Tensive) [38]. The NSA recorded the neck surface vibration and streamed it on a hard disk [39][40][41].…”
Section: Voice Biofeedback Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A signal-to-noise ratio of 45 dB was achieved using the recorder’s multiple modes for background noise suppression. Further details and verification tests of the NSA system were reported in our previous publications [ 4 , 5 , 11 , 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%