Discrimination based on gender and ethnicity in English and Polish housing markets

Abstract

Discrimination in the housing market is associated with decreased social integration and is costly at both social and individual levels. Here, we studied discrimination in English and Polish housing markets. In line with previous research, we expected ethnic-and gender-based discrimination to occur in both housing markets. Conducting a preregistered field experiment of discrimination in the housing market, we sent e-mails with inquiries about advertisements for 960 rentals in England and Poland. Inquiries were signed with Arabic-, English-, or Polish-sounding male and female names. As a measure of discrimination, we calculated the proportion of answers that we received. In the English housing market, there was no statistically significant difference between the proportions of responses received for inquiries signed with Arabic, English, or Polish male or female names. In the Polish housing market, we received fewer responses to inquiries signed with Arabic male names than inquiries signed with any other names. The study shows discrimination against Arabic men in the Polish housing market, but there was no evidence of ethnic-or gender-based discrimination in the English housing market.The results are discussed against the subordinate male target hypothesis as well as the current social and political situations in both countries.

Pourquoi Vincent a-t-il moins de chances d’obtenir un logement qu’Émilie ? Une analyse des causes de la discrimination à l’égard des noms masculins

“…5. Étant donné que le testing de Antfolk et al [2019] a été réalisé dans deux pays différents et reporte des résultats différents en fonction du pays testé, nous avons considéré cet article comme deux études distinctes.…”

Publishing in JCASP: The importance of theoretical relevance and of social impact

“…As stated by Muldoon and Cornish (2016), ‘JCASP aspires to publish research that makes a difference’ (p. 89). In this regard, we welcome contributions on a broad variety of psychological topics dealing with social and community areas that can be pertinent to practitioners and policy makers, for instance (but not limited to): volunteering (Livi et al, 2020), care (Graber, Zoli, Walker, & Artaraz, 2020), social interventions to cope with addictions (Bliuc et al, 2019), prosocial behaviour (Moloney et al, 2020), prejudice (Stathi, Di Bernardo, Vezzali, Pendleton, & Tropp, 2020), sexism (Salvati, Piumatti, Giacomantonio, & Baiocco, 2019), discrimination (Antfolk, Szala, & Oblom, 2019), migration (Bendjo, Karnilowicz, & Gill, 2019), social cohesion (Ponizovskiy, Arant, Larsen, & Boehnke, 2020), community participation (Sirlopù & Renger, 2020), mental health (Kapeli, Manuela, & Sibley, 2020), disability (Mpofu & Sefotho, 2019) and homelessness (Barile, Pruitt, & Parker, 2020).…”