2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating signs: Perceptual precursors to acquiring a visual-gestural language

Abstract: We tested hearing six-and ten-month-olds' ability to discriminate among three American Sign Language (ASL) parameters (location, handshape, and movement) as well as a grammatical marker (facial expression). ASL-naïve infants were habituated to a signer articulating a two-handed symmetrical sign in neutral space. During test, infants viewed novel two-handed signs that varied in only one parameter or in facial expression. Infants detected changes in the signer's facial expression and in the location of the sign … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which even very young (4–5 months) English infants could discriminate. Thus, the present findings, taken together with those of Wilbourn and Casasola, yield a more nuanced understanding of the developmental trajectory of the acquisition of handshape distinctions by infants exposed to ASL, suggesting a role for visual salience of the parameters marking these distinctions. Clearly, further work investigating the acquisition of different ASL handshape contrasts as well as different types of ASL contrasts is necessary to flesh out this understanding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which even very young (4–5 months) English infants could discriminate. Thus, the present findings, taken together with those of Wilbourn and Casasola, yield a more nuanced understanding of the developmental trajectory of the acquisition of handshape distinctions by infants exposed to ASL, suggesting a role for visual salience of the parameters marking these distinctions. Clearly, further work investigating the acquisition of different ASL handshape contrasts as well as different types of ASL contrasts is necessary to flesh out this understanding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Finally, because both our results and those of Baker et al. (2006) show that young infants are, indeed, capable of discriminating at least some handshapes, we suggest that discrimination of handshape per se cannot simply be a later developing ability, as suggested by Wilbourn and Casasola (2007). However, while our data show that young infants and ASL infants can demonstrate discrimination of handshape contrasts, it might yet be the case that contrasts involving different visual parameters have different acquisition trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been reported for a vowel length distinction used in Japanese wherein infants younger than 10 months fail to discriminate categorically (Sato, Sogabe, & Mazuka, ), whereas by 10 months of age they do (Mugitani, Pons, Fais, Werker, & Amano, ; Sato et al, ). Similarly, while young infants show a change between 6 and 10 months of age for categorical discrimination of the Flat versus Open hand sign (Baker et al, ; Palmer et al, ), they fail to show evidence of discriminating some other hand shapes used in sign at both 6 and 10 months (Wilbourn & Casasola, ). In all of these examples, experience played a role in inducing or enhancing sensitivity to a language distinction.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASL is a “visual, gestural language” that differs greatly from English and other verbal languages. [45] …”
Section: Introduction: Emergency Preparedness Communication For Vulnementioning
confidence: 99%