2004
DOI: 10.1289/txg.7036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating Different Classes of Toxicants by Transcript Profiling

Abstract: Male rats were treated with various model compounds or the appropriate vehicle controls. Most substances were either well-known hepatotoxicants or showed hepatotoxicity during preclinical testing. The aim of the present study was to determine if biological samples from rats treated with various compounds can be classified based on gene expression profiles. In addition to gene expression analysis using microarrays, a complete serum chemistry profile and liver and kidney histopathology were performed. We analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of transcript profiling for discrimination of toxic and nontoxic compounds in liver and other organs have also been developed in rodents (18), confirming the hypothesis that predictive modeling for classification of toxic agents and carcinogens is feasible. Here we used toxicogenomic approaches in human mesothelial cells, a cell type exquisitely sensitive to asbestos (19) and human contact-inhibited ovarian epithelial cells, a cell type not linked to carcinogenesis by asbestos, to determine whether the magnitude of altered gene expression by insoluble particulates correlated with their toxicity to cells and documented pathogenicity in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Models of transcript profiling for discrimination of toxic and nontoxic compounds in liver and other organs have also been developed in rodents (18), confirming the hypothesis that predictive modeling for classification of toxic agents and carcinogens is feasible. Here we used toxicogenomic approaches in human mesothelial cells, a cell type exquisitely sensitive to asbestos (19) and human contact-inhibited ovarian epithelial cells, a cell type not linked to carcinogenesis by asbestos, to determine whether the magnitude of altered gene expression by insoluble particulates correlated with their toxicity to cells and documented pathogenicity in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The value created from mining vast amounts of gene expression data has allowed the linking of gene expression changes with traditional measurements of pharmacological and toxicological activity. This connection of traditional and novel data provides context and meaning to the alterations in gene expression caused by a candidate drug or chemical (Amin et al, 2002;Bushel et al, 2002;Hamadeh et al, 2002aHamadeh et al, , 2002bSteiner et al, 2004;Fielden et al, 2005;Ruepp et al, 2005). Further, this database has been mined using rigorous, statistical approaches based on sophisticated classification algorithms and logistic regression producing a library of linear, robust binary classifiers (Ganter et al, 2005;Natsoulis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To classify individual gene expression profiles, previous liver gene expression profiles from male Wistar rats were used to generate a predictive support vector machine (SVM)-based predictive model for the following hepatotoxic categories: control/nontoxic, direct acting, peroxisome proliferation, cholestasis and steatosis [Lee, 1995]. Subsequently, gene expression profiles from the livers of control and treated rats were compared with the SVM Hepatotox_SVM_OVA_Versionl [Steiner et al 2004], and classified according to confidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%