2002
DOI: 10.1300/j288v02n04_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant Validation of the Modified Secondary Trauma Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal investigator organized a pencil and paper survey instrument that included the following items: (a) demographic questions on the age, race and gender of each Soldier, spouse, and child, the socio-economic status of the family, as well as the length and frequency of deployment(s), (b) the PTSD checklist, Military Version (PCL-M) (Weathers et al 1993) (c), the secondary trauma scale (STS) (Motta et al 2001), (d) the hurt-insult-threaten-scream (HITS) (Sherin et al 1998), (e) the relax-alone-friends-family-trouble (RAFFT) (Bastiaens et al 2002), (f) and the child behavior checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach and Rescorla 2001). The PCL-M portion was only completed by the soldier and the STS portions were only done by the spouse or partner.…”
Section: Design Data Collection and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal investigator organized a pencil and paper survey instrument that included the following items: (a) demographic questions on the age, race and gender of each Soldier, spouse, and child, the socio-economic status of the family, as well as the length and frequency of deployment(s), (b) the PTSD checklist, Military Version (PCL-M) (Weathers et al 1993) (c), the secondary trauma scale (STS) (Motta et al 2001), (d) the hurt-insult-threaten-scream (HITS) (Sherin et al 1998), (e) the relax-alone-friends-family-trouble (RAFFT) (Bastiaens et al 2002), (f) and the child behavior checklist (CBCL) (Achenbach and Rescorla 2001). The PCL-M portion was only completed by the soldier and the STS portions were only done by the spouse or partner.…”
Section: Design Data Collection and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale counting 18 items relevant to secondary trauma was given to the spouses or partners residing with military service member. Previous reliability for this scale has ranged from .82 (Motta et al 2001) to .89 (Motta et al 2004). Motta et al (2004) further developed the STS by providing cut-off scores suggesting that a score of 45 or higher be of concern to clinicians.…”
Section: Design Data Collection and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the instruments used to assess psychological distress undermine inference about STS for our results. Ideally, a measure such as the Modified Secondary Trauma Scale (MSTS: Motta et al, 2001) which assesses secondary PTSD symptoms should be used to measure this concept. Fourth, couples who reported physical domestic violence were excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difficulty in secondary trauma research is the relative lack of psychometrically sound measuring instruments for assessing this phenomenon, in comparison to the relative abundance of measures that assess the primary traumatic experience of PTSD. While the adult-oriented Secondary Trauma Scale (Motta, Hafeez, Sciancalepore, & Diaz, 2001) presents cutoff scores, all other measures of secondary trauma lack psychometrically validated cutoffs and so one's scores on the measures do not tell the researcher or clinician whether or not the individual being evaluated has a significant problem. Figley (1995), for example, developed the Compassion Fatigue Self-Test for Psychotherapists.…”
Section: Scales For Assessing Secondary Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the other measures noted in this section which deal primarily with therapists' reactions to their clients, the Secondary Trauma Scale (Motta et al, 2001) has been validated with samples involving members of the community, students, and practicing therapists. The Secondary Trauma Scale has a test-retest reliability of .87 for a 1-to 2-week interval, an alpha reliability of .89, and demonstrates sound concurrent and discriminant validity.…”
Section: Scales For Assessing Secondary Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%