“…The material consisted of 80 skulls (43 males, 37 females), which were evaluated as recommended by several authors (Niethammer & Krapp 1978;Kryštufek & Macholán 1998;Reutter et al 1999;Unterholzner & Willenig 2000;Frynta et al 2001;Cserkész et al 2008 -width of first upper molar, LM 2+3 -length of second and third upper molar, LOID -length of lower molar row (alveoli), LOIC -length of lower molar row (crown), LM1 -length of first lower molar, LaM1 -width of first lower molar, LB -basal length, LCb -condylobasal length, LN -length of os nasale, LFI -length of foramen incisivum, LMd -length of mandible, LaZ -zygomatic breadth, LaI -interorbital width, ACr -brain-case height without the choanae; FL -facial length, i.e. distance from the gnathion after the aboral edge of the hard palate, CI -thickness of the incisor; IBW -width of the braincase; LaCh -width of the choanae; A -breadth of the upper ramus of the zygomatic process of the maxilla, B -breadth of the zygomatic arch.…”