2001
DOI: 10.1560/un22-p31p-phkd-8d6x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant Analysis of Morphometric Characters in Four Species of Apodemus (Muridae: Rodentia) From Eastern Turkey and Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material consisted of 80 skulls (43 males, 37 females), which were evaluated as recommended by several authors (Niethammer & Krapp 1978;Kryštufek & Macholán 1998;Reutter et al 1999;Unterholzner & Willenig 2000;Frynta et al 2001;Cserkész et al 2008 -width of first upper molar, LM 2+3 -length of second and third upper molar, LOID -length of lower molar row (alveoli), LOIC -length of lower molar row (crown), LM1 -length of first lower molar, LaM1 -width of first lower molar, LB -basal length, LCb -condylobasal length, LN -length of os nasale, LFI -length of foramen incisivum, LMd -length of mandible, LaZ -zygomatic breadth, LaI -interorbital width, ACr -brain-case height without the choanae; FL -facial length, i.e. distance from the gnathion after the aboral edge of the hard palate, CI -thickness of the incisor; IBW -width of the braincase; LaCh -width of the choanae; A -breadth of the upper ramus of the zygomatic process of the maxilla, B -breadth of the zygomatic arch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material consisted of 80 skulls (43 males, 37 females), which were evaluated as recommended by several authors (Niethammer & Krapp 1978;Kryštufek & Macholán 1998;Reutter et al 1999;Unterholzner & Willenig 2000;Frynta et al 2001;Cserkész et al 2008 -width of first upper molar, LM 2+3 -length of second and third upper molar, LOID -length of lower molar row (alveoli), LOIC -length of lower molar row (crown), LM1 -length of first lower molar, LaM1 -width of first lower molar, LB -basal length, LCb -condylobasal length, LN -length of os nasale, LFI -length of foramen incisivum, LMd -length of mandible, LaZ -zygomatic breadth, LaI -interorbital width, ACr -brain-case height without the choanae; FL -facial length, i.e. distance from the gnathion after the aboral edge of the hard palate, CI -thickness of the incisor; IBW -width of the braincase; LaCh -width of the choanae; A -breadth of the upper ramus of the zygomatic process of the maxilla, B -breadth of the zygomatic arch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Filippucci et al 1996, Reutter et al 1999, Frynta and Mikulová 2001, Spitzenberger 2001, Barčiová and Macholán 2009, Jojić et al 2012. Just recently, with regard to the discriminatory bias of morphometric characters, differences in the distress call were proposed as the most reliable criterion for species identifi cation (Ancillotto et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%