2020
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2020.2965787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant Analysis for Radar Signal Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three features of envelope rising edge time [16] (rising edge slope), pulse width, and envelope top drop of different radar individuals are the least affected by environmental factors and the most reliable, and they do not fluctuate significantly with changes in the working mode and environmental factors of radar individuals. At the same time, they are less disturbed by multipath effects and other forms of interference in the transmission process, so these three features are commonly selected as fingerprint features on the envelope of radar radiation source individuals for analysis [27]. Figure 1 illustrates three different envelope fingerprint features.…”
Section: Signal Envelope Fingerprint Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three features of envelope rising edge time [16] (rising edge slope), pulse width, and envelope top drop of different radar individuals are the least affected by environmental factors and the most reliable, and they do not fluctuate significantly with changes in the working mode and environmental factors of radar individuals. At the same time, they are less disturbed by multipath effects and other forms of interference in the transmission process, so these three features are commonly selected as fingerprint features on the envelope of radar radiation source individuals for analysis [27]. Figure 1 illustrates three different envelope fingerprint features.…”
Section: Signal Envelope Fingerprint Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the nonlinear variations in transmitted signals caused by physical hardware as accurately as possible, we referenced the characteristics of signals received by radar receivers in reality and several validated research articles from various dimensions, such as the time domain and frequency domain [14,[26][27][28][29][30][31]. In our simulation, we first modeled three different radar systems by adjusting parameters such as pulse width (PW), bandwidth (BW), and radio frequency (RF), also known as the carrier frequency.…”
Section: Dataset and Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose nine common classifiers to recognize emitter identification, containing kernel support vector machine (KSVM) [20], probabilistic neural Fig. 7 Plots of moments for various emitters network (PNN) [12], k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [14], discriminant analysis classifier (DAC) [21], and their variants. Results are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DA classifier could be linear DA (LDA) or quadratic DA (QDA). LDA and QDA are widely used primarily due to their inherent capacity to address many multiclass problems without the requirement to tune hyperparameters to improve their classification accuracy [56]- [58].…”
Section: A Discriminant Analysis (Da) Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%