2011
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2010.529878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant analyses of peanut allergy severity scores

Abstract: Peanut allergy is one of the most prevalent food allergies. The possibility of a lethal accidental exposure and the persistence of the disease make it a public health problem. Evaluating the intensity of symptoms is accomplished with a double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), which scores the severity of reactions and measures the dose of peanut that elicits the first reaction. Since DBPCFC can result in life-threatening responses, we propose an alternate procedure with the long term goal of re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we extended our previous version of the algorithm [9] to a more general framework where any model selection criterion for which a test of significance is available can be used in addition to Wilks' Lambda and where forward covariate inclusion was replaced by stepwise selection. Of note, a version of the algorithm allowing the use of logistic regression with AIC as optimality criterion has already been coded and evaluated on two small datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article, we extended our previous version of the algorithm [9] to a more general framework where any model selection criterion for which a test of significance is available can be used in addition to Wilks' Lambda and where forward covariate inclusion was replaced by stepwise selection. Of note, a version of the algorithm allowing the use of logistic regression with AIC as optimality criterion has already been coded and evaluated on two small datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We already had to overcome these issues in a dataset we analyzed previously [9]. In order to clarify our objectives, recall briefly its framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%