2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretizing singular point sources in hyperbolic wave propagation problems

Abstract: We develop high order accurate source discretizations for hyperbolic wave propagation problems in first order formulation that are discretized by finite difference schemes. By studying the Fourier series expansions of the source discretization and the finite difference operator, we derive sufficient conditions for achieving design accuracy in the numerical solution. Only half of the conditions in Fourier space can be satisfied through moment conditions on the source discretization, and we develop smoothness co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interface conditions are of the same form as those considered in (98) and we may use the interface discretization presented in Theorem 3. References [16,21] describe how to discretize δ and ∂ x i δ. When using qth order finite difference stencils in the interior, the discretizations of δ and ∂ x i δ satisfy q and q + 1 moment conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Marine Seismic Exploration With Ocean-bottom Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface conditions are of the same form as those considered in (98) and we may use the interface discretization presented in Theorem 3. References [16,21] describe how to discretize δ and ∂ x i δ. When using qth order finite difference stencils in the interior, the discretizations of δ and ∂ x i δ satisfy q and q + 1 moment conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Marine Seismic Exploration With Ocean-bottom Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spurious oscillation can arise when source terms are introduced in schemes discretized by central finite differences. The triggering of spurious oscillations can be avoided by using Cartesian staggered grids, or by smoothing out the source discretization by imposing smoothness conditions, see [24]. However, there is no guarantee that spurious oscillations are avoided in our curvilinear staggered scheme.…”
Section: Point Source On the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above, δ(r 1 − r * ) is the Dirac distribution, centered at the source location r * , and s(t) is a given source time function. For a detailed discussion on how to discretize the Dirac distribution for hyperbolic problems, see [24]. To place the source on the boundary, we treat (47) as a boundary condition and impose it using a SAT term, see [22] for details.…”
Section: Point Source On the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry is discretized using two elastic blocks (one on each side of the crack) with (n + 1) × (n + 1) grid points and a single fluid block of size (n + 1) × (m + 1) , where n = 12 × 2 conditions (15). The manufactured solution in the fluid and the crack geometry are p(x, t) = sin(kx) cos(ωt), u(x, y, t) = sin(kx) sin(ky) cos(ωt) + sin(kx) cos(ωt), (38) (39) respectively. We prescribe the motion of the interface using The manufactured solution in the solid is…”
Section: Manufactured Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, when the earthquakes are much smaller than modeled wavelengths, can be treated as point moment tensor sources. Details on how to discretize the singular source terms with high-order accuracy can be found in [39]. Here, for simplicity, we excite waves by Downloaded 08/27/17 to 130.236.83.247.…”
Section: Excitation In the Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%