1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretization on Non-Orthogonal, Quadrilateral Grids for Inhomogeneous, Anisotropic Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
210
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect of coarsening is that K c becomes often anisotropic, even if the original hydraulic permeability K is isotropic. Recently, methods became available that cope with the off-diagonal components in a tensor [Aavatsmark et al, 1996;Lee et al, 1998;Anderman et al, 2002].…”
Section: Coarse-scale Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect of coarsening is that K c becomes often anisotropic, even if the original hydraulic permeability K is isotropic. Recently, methods became available that cope with the off-diagonal components in a tensor [Aavatsmark et al, 1996;Lee et al, 1998;Anderman et al, 2002].…”
Section: Coarse-scale Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gradient Discretization method (GDM) [5,3] provides a common mathematical framework for a number of numerical schemes dedicated to the approximation of elliptic or parabolic problems, linear or nonlinear, coupled or not; these include conforming and non conforming finite element, mixed finite element, hybrid mixed mimetic schemes [4] and some Multi-Point Flux Approximation [1] and Discrete Duality finite volume schemes [2] : we refer to [3, Part III] for more on this (note that in the present proceedings, it is shown that in some way the Discontinuous Galerkin schemes may also enter this framework [6]). Let us recall this framework in the case of the following linear elliptic problem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the more accurate multipoint flux approximation (MPFA), on the other hand, additional blocks are involved, which lead naturally to larger stencils than those in the TPFA methods. In 3D structured grids, for example, the MPFA method developed by [1] results in a 27-point stencil for the cellcentered pressure equations, compared with the sevenpoint stencils used in the TPFA methods. The approach has been studied by others as well [30,53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%