2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41640-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretization of Mixed Formulations of Elliptic Problems on Polyhedral Meshes

Abstract: We review basic design principles underpinning the construction of mimetic finite difference and a few finite volume and finite element schemes for mixed formulations of elliptic problems. For a class of low-order mixed-hybrid schemes, we show connections between these principles and prove that the consistency and stability conditions must lead to a member of the mimetic family of schemes regardless of the selected discretization framework. Finally, we give two examples of using flexibility of the mimetic fram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are found in . A more exhaustive list of contributions to the development of the MFD method can also be found in the two review works [33] and [34]. Other discretization frameworks related to general meshes include the polygonal/polyhedral finite element method (PFEM) [35,36], the finite volume methods [37], the hybrid high-order (HHO) method [38,39], the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method [40,41], the hybridized discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method [42], the weak Galerkin (wG) method [43], the virtual element method (VEM) [44] and its connections with the PFEM [45], and the more recent Discontinuous Skeletal Gradient Discretization (DSGD) [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are found in . A more exhaustive list of contributions to the development of the MFD method can also be found in the two review works [33] and [34]. Other discretization frameworks related to general meshes include the polygonal/polyhedral finite element method (PFEM) [35,36], the finite volume methods [37], the hybrid high-order (HHO) method [38,39], the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method [40,41], the hybridized discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method [42], the weak Galerkin (wG) method [43], the virtual element method (VEM) [44] and its connections with the PFEM [45], and the more recent Discontinuous Skeletal Gradient Discretization (DSGD) [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheme used in this work chooses the divergence as the primary operator and uses finitevolume-like approximation of it in cells, while the approximation of the gradient operator is built in such a way that it is negatively adjoint to the discrete divergence in appropriate discrete spaces with their scalar products. Details on the discrete gradient construction can be found in [34]. The presence of solution-dependent relative permeability in (5) makes the construction of the scheme more complicated, since some approximations of nonlinear coefficient may lead to incorrect solutions for transient equations [35].…”
Section: Mimetic Finite Difference Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• general presentation of the MFD method:book [31]; review papers [97,108]; connection of MFD with other methods [105]; benchmarks [103,111]; conference paper [112],…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%