2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9274(02)00112-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretization effects in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Abstract: We show that discretization effects in finite-difference simulations of blowup solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLS) initially accelerate self focusing but later arrest the collapse, resulting instead in focusing-defocusing oscillations. The modified equation of the semi-discrete NLS, which is the NLS with highorder anisotropic dispersion, captures the arrest of collapse but not the subsequent oscillations. Discretization effects in perturbed NLS equations are also discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our NLS simulations we use standard fourth-order finite-difference schemes for the spatial derivatives and explicit fourth-order Runge-Kutta for marching in z. As has recently been shown in [9], in finite-difference simulations of NLS solutions that are known analytically to become singular, the computed solution still remains bounded. Therefore, there is always an element of arbitrariness in selecting a numerical criterion for blowup in NLS simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our NLS simulations we use standard fourth-order finite-difference schemes for the spatial derivatives and explicit fourth-order Runge-Kutta for marching in z. As has recently been shown in [9], in finite-difference simulations of NLS solutions that are known analytically to become singular, the computed solution still remains bounded. Therefore, there is always an element of arbitrariness in selecting a numerical criterion for blowup in NLS simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the two is due to backscattering and can be used to quantify the level of backscattering for a particular setting; see [10,12]. 9 In Table 4.2 we provide the values of maximum self-focusing and maximum backscattering in the NLH, defined as max r,z |E(z, r)| and max r |E(0, r) − E 0 inc (r)|, respectively, for various values of and δ. The dash "-" in a particular cell of Table 4.2 means that the level of damping was insufficient to guarantee the convergence of the numerical algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation is the modified equation of the semi-discrete second-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation (see [11]). Clearly, the following equations are special cases of (1.1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for Eq. (1.1), both local well-posedness and global well-posedness are sparsely studied; the only available results are those of Fibich and his co-workers [10][11][12][13][14][15] on the investigation of possible critical exponents for global existence, but those results do not consider local existence. Their results are based on the conservation laws of (1.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is concerned with the Cauchy problem of the following fourth-order nonlinear dispersive equation in R n × R: (1) iu t + ∆u + |u| α u + a d i u xixixixi = 0, x ∈ R n , t ∈ R. u(x, 0) = ϕ(x),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%