2018
DOI: 10.1057/s41310-018-0052-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discretionary environmental disclosures of corporations in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of using EBITDA rather than net income is that it allows for comparison across forms. According to Chijoke-Mgbame and Mgbame (2018), the independent variable CSRD is measured as a dummy variable taking the value of 1 if there is a section in the published annual report dedicated to CSR activities and 0 otherwise. Given the voluntary disclosure system in Nigeria, companies that decide to dedicate a section in their annual report to discuss and present their CSR activities demonstrate the importance of such activities to the company.…”
Section: Data Methodology and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of using EBITDA rather than net income is that it allows for comparison across forms. According to Chijoke-Mgbame and Mgbame (2018), the independent variable CSRD is measured as a dummy variable taking the value of 1 if there is a section in the published annual report dedicated to CSR activities and 0 otherwise. Given the voluntary disclosure system in Nigeria, companies that decide to dedicate a section in their annual report to discuss and present their CSR activities demonstrate the importance of such activities to the company.…”
Section: Data Methodology and Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore imperative to examine the effect if any, of CSRD on the performance of companies in Nigeria. In addition to the voluntary system, Nigeria, like most developing countries, is plagued with weak institutions, poor governance practices, weak enforcement agencies and corrupt practices (Adegbite, 2015; Amaeshi et al , 2016; Chijoke-Mgbame and Mgbame, 2018). These shortcomings in the system no doubt provide an enabling environment for firms not to engage in CSR activities and also not to disclose the same in any format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firm size is the third commonly examined firm characteristic associated with sustainability disclosure in Africa, however, the empirical results are equally mixed. For example, the majority of the studies found evidence of a positive impact of firm size on SDGs and sustainability reporting (Agyei & Yankey, 2019; Chijoke‐Mgbame & Mgbame, 2018; Coetzee & van Staden, 2011; Cordova et al, 2020; Iredele, 2020; Kazemikhasragh et al, 2021; Masoud & Vij, 2021; Mathuva et al, 2017; Welbeck, 2017). Specifically, the literature assumes that bigger firms engage more in sustainability disclosure than smaller firms (Masoud & Vij, 2021) because they are more visible and well‐known among market participants.…”
Section: Thematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the results are equally inconsistent. For example, some studies found a positive effect of firm profitability, financial leverage, and firm revenue growth on the adoption of sustainability and SDGs reporting (Chakroun et al, 2017; Cordova et al, 2020; Haladu & Bin‐Nashwan, 2022; Kazemikhasragh et al, 2021; Mathuva et al, 2017; Tilt et al, 2021) and the extent of the disclosure (Chijoke‐Mgbame & Mgbame, 2018). However, this relationship is moderated by environmental policy administrators (Haladu & Bin‐Nashwan, 2022).…”
Section: Thematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation