1964
DOI: 10.1063/1.1725359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discreteness-of-Charge Adsorption Micropotentials. I. Infinite Imaging

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inEffects of image charges, interfacial charge discreteness, and surface roughness on the zeta potential of spherical electric double layers A selfconsistent study of ion adsorption and discrete charge effects in the electrical double layerThe Ershler infinite imaging model for adsorption of ions from electrolytes is discussed ill detail. An incorrect derivation of the basic equations for the micropotential is critically examined and a correct derivation provided. ~he potential a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible origin for a putative stabilization of the carboxylate anion at the monolayer interface is the image charge interactions which arise from the fact that the charges on these anions are discrete and are, therefore, not smeared out over the entire monolayer/solution interface as well as from the fact that these charge are bound to a very high dielectric medium (the gold electrode) by a very low dielectric constant medium (the monolayer up to the PAD). However, calculations based upon the three phase (i.e., solution/film/electrode) model for the image charge interactions of an ion present on the solution side of an interface with a film-coated electrode which has been proposed by Liu and Newton demonstrate that the stabilization (i.e., negative change in the free energy for the hydrogen ion dissociation reaction (Δ G r )) effected by these image charge interactions is not strong enough to overcome the positive change in Δ G r caused by transferring the carboxylate anions from a high dielectric constant medium (an aqueous electrolyte solution) to a relatively low dielectric constant medium (the MUA monolayer/electrolyte solution interface) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible origin for a putative stabilization of the carboxylate anion at the monolayer interface is the image charge interactions which arise from the fact that the charges on these anions are discrete and are, therefore, not smeared out over the entire monolayer/solution interface as well as from the fact that these charge are bound to a very high dielectric medium (the gold electrode) by a very low dielectric constant medium (the monolayer up to the PAD). However, calculations based upon the three phase (i.e., solution/film/electrode) model for the image charge interactions of an ion present on the solution side of an interface with a film-coated electrode which has been proposed by Liu and Newton demonstrate that the stabilization (i.e., negative change in the free energy for the hydrogen ion dissociation reaction (Δ G r )) effected by these image charge interactions is not strong enough to overcome the positive change in Δ G r caused by transferring the carboxylate anions from a high dielectric constant medium (an aqueous electrolyte solution) to a relatively low dielectric constant medium (the MUA monolayer/electrolyte solution interface) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of treatments of the electrolyte double layer (9-13), it has again been assumed that a t least above some miniinun~ surface coverage, the ions adsorbed on the electrode (usually a mercury drop) arrange themselves in a fixed hexagonal array. In this situation, there is the possibility of imaging of adions in the diffuse double layer as well as in the electrode (10)(11)(12)(13). Such imaging leads to an infinite array of image charges perpendicular to the adsorbent surface and has been termed infinite imaging (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the treatments of Buff and Stillinger and those which assume an array model ab initio are complementary, but one should knoxv where the crossover occurs, and this question, while not considered by Buff and Stillinger, is approxiinately answered by this paper. As we shall see, even for infinite imaging (13), where adsorbed concentrations must be somexvhat Can. J. Chem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have used theories that have been satisfactorily applied in both biological [12,21] and model membrane [3,18,29,381 systems. Double layer theory, though ignoring discreteness of charge effects [5,14,34], is a reasonable starting point for understanding surface charge effects. Not only does smeared charge theory allow for screening effects, it also permits one to mathematically couple bulk screening to adsorption theory in a self-consistent, relatively simple way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%