2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40314-014-0149-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete time schemes for optimal control problems with monotone controls

Abstract: Abstract. In this article we consider the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation associated to the optimization problem with monotone controls. The problem deals with the infinite horizon case and costs with update coefficients. We study the numerical solution through the discretization in time by finite differences. Without the classical semiconcavity-like assumptions, we prove that the convergence in this problem is of order h γ in contrast with the order h γ 2 valid for general control problems. This differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously presented discretization allowed us to obtain important convergence results (see [13]). Nevertheless, in order to obtain numerical methods to estimate u h it is also necessary the discretization in the state variables.…”
Section: Fully Discrete Infinite Horizon Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previously presented discretization allowed us to obtain important convergence results (see [13]). Nevertheless, in order to obtain numerical methods to estimate u h it is also necessary the discretization in the state variables.…”
Section: Fully Discrete Infinite Horizon Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study a fully discrete scheme for the numerical resolution of the infinite horizon monotone optimal control problem, through the analysis of the associated finite horizon problem as in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13, Lemma 4.1] Under the hypotheses (1.3) and (1.4), we have|u(x, a) − u T (t, x, a)| ≤ M f λ e −λ(T −t) . (2.6)and the Theorem 2.1 [13,. Theorem 3.5] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%