2008
DOI: 10.1115/1.2936871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete-Time Control of Linear Time-Periodic Systems

Abstract: A discrete-time control design approach for periodically time-varying systems is introduced. The method employs a period-to-period (point-mapping) formulation of the system’s dynamics and a parametrization of the control input to obtain an equivalent time-invariant discrete-time representation of the system. The representation is generalized to include sampling within the period and varying sampling rates in different feedback loops. The proposed formulation allows for the design of feedback control laws using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most control designs for LPTV systems require a parametric model of the system, including pole placement, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) control, linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, H2/ H approaches, internal model principle, and LTI approximations . In addition, designs based on time‐invariant reformulations are often based on parametric models, including Floquet‐Lyapunov transformations,(section 1.2) and lifting approaches,(section 1.6) which enable the use of full state feedback, pole placement, model matching, LQR, LQG, and H2/ H control . However, as is argued in the work of Oomen et al, despite the availability of solid control theory, such model‐based designs are demanding because (i) obtaining a parametric LPTV model is difficult and (ii) typical LTI interpretations are not valid, leading to complications for the actual design …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most control designs for LPTV systems require a parametric model of the system, including pole placement, linear quadratic regulator (LQR) control, linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, H2/ H approaches, internal model principle, and LTI approximations . In addition, designs based on time‐invariant reformulations are often based on parametric models, including Floquet‐Lyapunov transformations,(section 1.2) and lifting approaches,(section 1.6) which enable the use of full state feedback, pole placement, model matching, LQR, LQG, and H2/ H control . However, as is argued in the work of Oomen et al, despite the availability of solid control theory, such model‐based designs are demanding because (i) obtaining a parametric LPTV model is difficult and (ii) typical LTI interpretations are not valid, leading to complications for the actual design …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, a new approach for control design of perturbed LPTV systems [14,15] to develop momentum unloading control laws is presented. In this approach, the perturbed LPTV control design problem is formulated as a discrete-time robust control design problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%