2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete-time anti-windup compensation for synchrotron electron beam controllers with rate constrained actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth mentioning that to eliminate high-frequency noise, we use a filter. 3234 The corrective steering angles can be applied to vehicle wheels by the actuators. When the sensors have measurement noise, the corrective steering angles that extracted from controller (as shown with blue lines in Figure 30) due to their high frequency cannot be applied to vehicle wheels by the actuators.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth mentioning that to eliminate high-frequency noise, we use a filter. 3234 The corrective steering angles can be applied to vehicle wheels by the actuators. When the sensors have measurement noise, the corrective steering angles that extracted from controller (as shown with blue lines in Figure 30) due to their high frequency cannot be applied to vehicle wheels by the actuators.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the actuator saturates, the controller continues to integrate the error with no effect on the actuation input, leading to significant performance degradations, stability issues and even possible mechanical failures of FTS systems [17], [18]. To this end, various control approaches have been considered for saturation nonlinearities, e.g., discrete-time periodic Lyapunov approach [19], gainscheduled control [20], nested switching control [21], antiwindup compensation [22], [23], and internal model compensation [24]. It should be noted that most of these methods are discussed in a general control framework without considering the specific characteristics of the Smith predictor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical systems with actuator saturation are ubiquitous, which can cause adverse effects or even instability of the control systems. To deal with saturation nonlinearity, different methods have been proposed, including the convex combination method (Hu et al, 2002), dead-zone function method (Tong and Li, 2013) and anti-windup compensation method (Gayadeen and Duncan, 2016; Li et al, 2016a; Li and Lin, 2014). For local stability, scholars are devoted to calculating the domain of attraction for both continuous-time systems (Mohammadpour and Binazadeh, 2018; Tarbouriech et al, 2011; Zuo et al, 2010) and discrete-time systems (Binazadeh and Bahmani, 2017; Gayadeen and Duncan, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%