2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete optimization of ray potentials for semantic 3D reconstruction

Abstract: Dense semantic 3D reconstruction is typically formulated as a discrete or continuous problem over label assignments in a voxel grid, combining semantic and depth likelihoods in a Markov Random Field framework. The depth and semantic information is incorporated as a unary potential, smoothed by a pairwise regularizer. However, modelling likelihoods as a unary potential does not model the problem correctly leading to various undesirable visibility artifacts.We propose to formulate an optimization problem that di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their method lacks a global probabilistic formulation. To address this limitation, a number of approaches have phrased 3D reconstruction as inference in a Markov random field (MRF) by exploiting the special characteristics of high-order ray potentials [19,28,33,35]. Ray potentials allow for accurately describing the image formation process, yielding 3D reconstructions consistent with the input images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, their method lacks a global probabilistic formulation. To address this limitation, a number of approaches have phrased 3D reconstruction as inference in a Markov random field (MRF) by exploiting the special characteristics of high-order ray potentials [19,28,33,35]. Ray potentials allow for accurately describing the image formation process, yielding 3D reconstructions consistent with the input images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our MRF aggregates these depth distributions by exploiting occlusion relationships across all viewpoints, yielding significantly improved depth predictions. Occlusion constraints are encoded using high-order ray potentials [19,28,35]. We differ from [19,35] in that we do not reason about surface appearance within the MRF but instead incorporate depth distributions estimated by our CNN.…”
Section: Markov Random Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite mesh refinement, the resulting surface remains a jagged approximation of a locally-smooth geometry, which may then require expensive post-processing to achieve a compact representation, e.g., by fitting 3D geometric primitives [19,15]. The situation is even worse with voxel-based approaches [12,30]. Pixel-based stereo techniques, which build disparity maps, have seen a tremendous increase in performance since early approaches [16] and their later extensions using second order smoothness priors [40,27], color models [2] or semantic classification [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The pairwise term is the combination of smoothness and class-specific priors, the latter is learned from manually annotated data, and defines the probability of class changes depending on the normal transition. This work has been extended in [29,28] to embed higher order ray potentials into the optimization of the graphical model. For a more in-depth discussion about semantic volumetric reconstruction we refer the reader to [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%