2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.11813
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Maximum principle of a high order finite difference scheme for a generalized Allen-Cahn equation

Abstract: We consider solving a generalized Allen-Cahn equation coupled with a passive convection for a given incompressible velocity field. The numerical scheme consists of the first order accurate stabilized implicit explicit time discretization and a fourth order accurate finite difference scheme, which is obtained from the finite difference formulation of the Q 2 spectral element method. We prove that the discrete maximum principle holds under suitable mesh size and time step constraints. The same result also applie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scheme is unconditionally energy-stable by choosing proper parameters. Shen and Zhang [26] considered a high-order finite difference scheme for a generalized Allen-Cahn equation coupled with a passive convection for a given incompressible velocity field. They proved that the discrete maximum principle holds under suitable mesh size and time step constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme is unconditionally energy-stable by choosing proper parameters. Shen and Zhang [26] considered a high-order finite difference scheme for a generalized Allen-Cahn equation coupled with a passive convection for a given incompressible velocity field. They proved that the discrete maximum principle holds under suitable mesh size and time step constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the central difference discretization discussed above, the lumped mass finite element method with piecewise linear basis functions can also be adopted and Lemma 2.3 still holds correspondingly [14]. In addition, there have been some initial explorations on the MBP-preserving methods using the fourth-order accurate spatial discretization, such as the compact difference approximation [49] and the finite difference formulation of the Q 2 spectral element method [47], combined with the Euler-type time-stepping approaches. However, it is not obvious that whether these fourth-order discrete Laplace operators satisfy Lemma 2.3, and thus it is worthy of further investigations on the combination of higher-order spatial discretizations with the exponential integrator methods studied in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%