2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54631-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Logarithm in GF(2809) with FFS

Abstract: Abstract. The year 2013 has seen several major complexity advances for the discrete logarithm problem in multiplicative groups of smallcharacteristic finite fields. These outmatch, asymptotically, the Function Field Sieve (FFS) approach, which was so far the most efficient algorithm known for this task. Yet, on the practical side, it is not clear whether the new algorithms are uniformly better than FFS. This article presents the state of the art with regard to the FFS algorithm, and reports data from a record-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would require approximately 2 77 arithmetic operations on numbers of p bits, since we only need the value of logarithms modulo 2 p − 1. Comparing with the most recent data of the function field sieve [2], this L(1/3) algorithm remains more efficient in this range.…”
Section: Remarks On the Special Case Of F P K P And K Primementioning
confidence: 93%
“…This would require approximately 2 77 arithmetic operations on numbers of p bits, since we only need the value of logarithms modulo 2 p − 1. Comparing with the most recent data of the function field sieve [2], this L(1/3) algorithm remains more efficient in this range.…”
Section: Remarks On the Special Case Of F P K P And K Primementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ROW_FIXED cutting strategy split the loop in a fixed number of iterations (256 in this benchmarks) allowing the scheduler to efficiently balance the workload over the cores and the tasks are big enough to cover the management overhead. Table 2: Performance in Gfops of PALADIn compared to OpenMP and TBB "parallel for" for the CSR spmv operation of two sparses matrices arising in the discrete logarithm problem [2].…”
Section: Spmv Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where for the first equality we use that Q ∈ E(F q ) and R ∈ E [2], and for the third equality we use that Q ∈ E[n − 2k] and R ∈ T n .…”
Section: An Equation For the Trace Zero Subgroupmentioning
confidence: 99%