2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-012-1256-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete lattice effect of various forcing methods of body force on immersed Boundary-Lattice Boltzmann method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it can correctly recover equations ( 1) and ( 2) by a Chapman-Enskog multi-scale expansion with second-order accuracy for either steady flow or unsteady flow, and either uniform external force or non-uniform external force. This was further confirmed by Son et al [26]. The Guo et al [25] model has been widely applied in fluid-structure interaction flows.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, it can correctly recover equations ( 1) and ( 2) by a Chapman-Enskog multi-scale expansion with second-order accuracy for either steady flow or unsteady flow, and either uniform external force or non-uniform external force. This was further confirmed by Son et al [26]. The Guo et al [25] model has been widely applied in fluid-structure interaction flows.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…drs N (26) As can be seen in equations (26), (25) and (22), drs is decided by the regularized delta function δij (· ) and the Lagrangian points step ds, which will be depicted in Section 4.4.…”
Section: Boundary Thickening Direct Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The schemes considering the collision effect (ie, the BG and GZS schemes) perform slightly better than those without consideration of the effect (ie, the WFM/HM and L/M schemes) in terms of the accuracy of velocity (Table 1), which is consistent with the previous studies. 28,39,48 Besides, the comparison between the WFM/HM coupled with the two LB models (the first and second row in Table 1) shows that the combination of the hydrostatic pressure gradient and the bed slope indeed minimizes the discretization error and makes MLBSWE prone to produce more accurate solutions when the forcing schemes are used to deal with the effect of the bed elevation, 18 although the discrepancy is not so remarkable.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%