2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2012-05698-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete flat surfaces and linear Weingarten surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space

Abstract: We define discrete flat surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space H 3 from the perspective of discrete integrable systems and prove properties that justify the definition. We show how these surfaces correspond to previously defined discrete constant mean curvature 1 surfaces in H 3 , and we also describe discrete focal surfaces (discrete caustics) that can be used to define singularities on discrete flat surfaces. Along the way, we also examine discrete linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant type in H 3 , and consider an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that an imaginary parameter still yields a real geometry, as the semi-Riemannian symmetric space of point pairs in a conformal n-sphere is self dual; a change of sign of the curved flat parameter does not change the geometry of the curved flat, see[5, §5.5.19] 6. This, in fact, shows that flat fronts are Guichard surfaces, which were shown to be Ω-surfaces in[2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that an imaginary parameter still yields a real geometry, as the semi-Riemannian symmetric space of point pairs in a conformal n-sphere is self dual; a change of sign of the curved flat parameter does not change the geometry of the curved flat, see[5, §5.5.19] 6. This, in fact, shows that flat fronts are Guichard surfaces, which were shown to be Ω-surfaces in[2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a K ≡ 1 surface with Weierstrass-type representation in H 3 , it was shown in [19] that, without loss of generality, |κ (m,n),(m,n+1) | > 1 and |κ (m,n),(m+1,n) | < 1 for all m and n, which we note in the following theorem: Theorem 6.1. In the case of a K ≡ 1 surface in H 3 with Weierstrass-type representation so that the horizontal edges have principal curvatures with absolute value greater than 1, the first inequality in Definition 6.1 is equivalent to the definition of singular vertices for discrete flat surfaces in H 3 as given in [19].…”
Section: Singular Vertices On Discrete Nonzero Cgc Surfaces In Mmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is precisely what allowed for the description of singularities of discrete flat (i.e. K ≡ 1) surfaces in H 3 as given in [19]. Here we develop that into a definition without reliance on a Weierstrass type representation, extending it to all discrete surfaces in any M 3 with nonzero constant Gaussian curvature.…”
Section: Singular Vertices On Discrete Nonzero Cgc Surfaces In Mmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations