2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete element modelling of concrete submitted to dynamic loading at high strain rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
102
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniaxial compression test is a common method for determining the mechanical properties of granular materials of interest to technological process designers. Both, physical [31,32] and numerical [10,[33][34][35][36] modeling of the compression of a granular solid may provide useful scientific insight and valuable knowledge necessary for efficient design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniaxial compression test is a common method for determining the mechanical properties of granular materials of interest to technological process designers. Both, physical [31,32] and numerical [10,[33][34][35][36] modeling of the compression of a granular solid may provide useful scientific insight and valuable knowledge necessary for efficient design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slab is thus modeled as a continuous material with an elastic-brittle constitutive behavior. Yet, similar to what is classically done for concrete (Meguro and Hakuno, 1989;Kusano et al, 1992;Camborde et al, 2000;Hentz et al, 2004), the response of this layer to the dynamic propagation of failure in the WL is also computed with the DE method. In that case, however, the considered elements (grains of size r) have no physical meaning and should only be regarded as entities of discretization similar to the mesh size in FE models.…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cundall (1989); Iwashita and Oda (2000) for frictional granular materials or Hagenmuller et al (2015) for snow), the grains involved in the DE model developed in this study should not be regarded as snow grains, and that both r wl and r are only discretization scales whose choice will result from a compromise between resolution and computational cost as classically done to model concrete fracture (Hentz et al, 2004). We consider here a meter-scale model where the advantage of the DE method is its ability to mimic the poorly known mechanical response of the weak layer and to account for the different modes of failure displayed by snow (shear, compression, tension).…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was first developed in the early 1980s (1). More recently, researchers have used this method to study damage in heterogeneous solids, such as concrete (2) or rock (3), and homogeneous materials, such as ceramics (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%