2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete element modeling of a Mars Exploration Rover wheel in granular material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of a MER wheel digging test and a Mars in situ scuff test (i = 1) using a 3-D DEM demonstrated that quite reasonable agreement between test data and DEM simulation results could be achieved (Knuth and Hopkins, 2011;Knuth et al, 2012). Simulation results from these studies (Knuth and Hopkins, 2011;Knuth et al, 2012) indicate that particle shape is extremely important in replicating experimental data.…”
Section: Dem Simulations For High Slip Mer Wheel Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies of a MER wheel digging test and a Mars in situ scuff test (i = 1) using a 3-D DEM demonstrated that quite reasonable agreement between test data and DEM simulation results could be achieved (Knuth and Hopkins, 2011;Knuth et al, 2012). Simulation results from these studies (Knuth and Hopkins, 2011;Knuth et al, 2012) indicate that particle shape is extremely important in replicating experimental data.…”
Section: Dem Simulations For High Slip Mer Wheel Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Simulation results from these studies (Knuth and Hopkins, 2011;Knuth et al, 2012) indicate that particle shape is extremely important in replicating experimental data. Using spherical particles to represent the granular media was not adequate to accurately replicate wheel sinkage and torque.…”
Section: Dem Simulations For High Slip Mer Wheel Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Physics based models, especially finite element methods (FEM) and discrete element methods (DEM), have high computational costs and time requirements (Taheri et al, 2015). Despite the costs, there has been progress in the implementation of both the FEM and DEM methods for terramechanics applications (e.g., Knuth et al, 2012;Xia, 2011;Smith and Peng, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%