1969
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177697379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Dynamic Programming with Sensitive Discount Optimality Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
150
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Veinott [27]. Note that the inverse of (I − P ) has the expansion form (I − P ) −1 = I + P + P 2 + .…”
Section: Extensions and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veinott [27]. Note that the inverse of (I − P ) has the expansion form (I − P ) −1 = I + P + P 2 + .…”
Section: Extensions and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the techniques used here are, perhaps, somewhat more in the spirit of the recent developments such as those reported in Avrachenkov et al [9,10]. More particularly, in the context of perturbation and sensitivity analysis of MDP's the papers by Schweitzer [65,66] and Veinott [68] are quite relevant to the results reported here.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Quadratic Perturbationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The restriction to stationary nonrandomized policies is justified because Hypothesis C has been shown to suffice for such a policy to be optimal over the class of all history-remembering policies, see [5] or [21]. Further, such a policy can be found by linear programming, by policy improvement, or by successive approximation.…”
Section: A Sequential Decision Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the risk-averse exponential utility function has u(0) = −1 and the weakened hypothesis can be used to work around this difficulty by ruling out any stationary policy that plays a bandit at each state in any closed communicating class. A second difficulty arises from the fact that the interchange argument in Proposition 5.1 can no longer rest on the classic results in [5] or [21]. The interested reader is referred to the analysis in [6] and to the characterization of optimal policies in [7].…”
Section: Relaxing Hypothesis Cmentioning
confidence: 99%