2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202509003887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Choices Under Social Influence: Generic Properties

Abstract: We consider a model of socially interacting individuals that make a binary choice in a context of positive additive endogenous externalities. It encompasses as particular cases several models from the sociology and economics literature. We extend previous results to the case of a general distribution of idiosyncratic preferences, called here Idiosyncratic Willingnesses to Pay (IWP).Positive additive externalities yield a family of inverse demand curves that include the classical downward sloping ones but also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though frequently cited as important factors in the spread of many behavioural trends, these kinds of influences tend to feature in mathematical models only as part of initial uptake (cf. infection) 10,19,22,23,31 ; their impact on other aspects of behavioural transmission is rarely considered, and then limited to rates of behaviour relapse (see, for example, the heroin and bulimia models of White-Comiskey 34 and González et al 9 respectively). Indeed, to our knowledge, the effect of peer influence on the rate at which individuals abandon a given practice is yet to be considered, an omission we shall give special attention.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Though frequently cited as important factors in the spread of many behavioural trends, these kinds of influences tend to feature in mathematical models only as part of initial uptake (cf. infection) 10,19,22,23,31 ; their impact on other aspects of behavioural transmission is rarely considered, and then limited to rates of behaviour relapse (see, for example, the heroin and bulimia models of White-Comiskey 34 and González et al 9 respectively). Indeed, to our knowledge, the effect of peer influence on the rate at which individuals abandon a given practice is yet to be considered, an omission we shall give special attention.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Publisher's copyright statement:Electronic version of an article published as Mathematical models and methods in applied sciences, 24,4, 2014,10.1142/S0218202513500656 c 2014 World Scientic Publishing Co. http://www.worldscientic.com/worldscinet/m3asAdditional information:
Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. A generalised compartmental method for investigating the spread of socially determined behaviour is introduced, and cast in the specific context of societal smoking dynamics with multiple peer influence.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• People vary in their extent to which they want to pay for environmental benefits, i.e., heterogeneity of WTP (see Gordon et al 2005Gordon et al , 2007Nadal et al 2005). …”
Section: A Simple Set Of Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%