Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the difference between self-reported hearing status and hearing impairment assessed using conventional audiometry. The associated factors were examined when a concordance between self-reported hearing and audiometric measures was lacking.MethodsIn total, 19,642 individuals ≥20 years of age who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted from 2009 through 2012 were enrolled. Pure-tone hearing threshold audiometry (PTA) was measured and classified into three levels: <25 dB (normal hearing); ≥25 dB <40 dB (mild hearing impairment); and ≥40 dB (moderate-to-severe hearing impairment). The self-reported hearing loss was categorized into 3 categories. The participants were categorized into three groups: the concordance (matched between self-reported hearing loss and audiometric PTA), overestimation (higher self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA), and underestimation groups (lower self-reported hearing loss compared to audiometric PTA). The associations of age, sex, education level, stress level, anxiety/depression, tympanic membrane (TM) status, hearing aid use, and tinnitus with the discrepancy between the hearing self-reported hearing loss and audiometric pure tone threshold results were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression analysis with complex sampling.ResultsOverall, 80.1%, 7.1%, and 12.8% of the participants were assigned to the concordance, overestimation, and underestimation groups, respectively. Older age (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 1.28 [95% confidence interval = 1.19–1.37] and 2.80 [2.62–2.99] for the overestimation and the underestimation groups, respectively), abnormal TM (2.17 [1.46–3.23] and 1.59 [1.17–2.15]), and tinnitus (2.44 [2.10–2.83] and 1.61 [1.38–1.87]) were positively correlated with both the overestimation and underestimation groups. Compared with specialized workers, service workers, manual workers, and the unemployed were more likely to be in the overestimation group (1.48 [1.11–1.98], 1.39 [1.04–1.86], and 1.50 [1.18–1.90], respectively), and service workers were more likely to be in the underestimation group (AOR = 1.42 [1.01–1.99]). Higher education level (0.77 [0.59–1.01] and 0.43 [0.33–0.57]) and hearing aid use (0.36 [0.17–0.77] and 0.23 [0.13–0.43]) were negatively associated with being in the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Compared with males, females were less likely to be assigned to the underestimation group (0.43 [0.37–0.50]). Stress (1.98 [1.32–2.98]) and anxiety/depression (1.30 [1.06–1.59]) were associated with overestimation group.ConclusionOlder age, lower education level, occupation, abnormal TM, non-hearing aid use, and tinnitus were related to both overestimation and underestimation groups. Male gender was related to underestimation, and stress and anxiety/depression were correlated with overestimation group. An understanding of these factors associated with the self-reported hearing loss will be instrumental to identifying and managing hearin...

Assessing hearing loss in older adults with a single question and person characteristics; Comparison with pure tone audiometry in the Rotterdam Study

“…The ability of the question to identify hearing loss increases substantially when other factors are taken into account, with age being the most important one. Our results are in line with the increasing support in literature for using a single question as an estimator for hearing loss in absence of pure tone audiometry [14,15,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. There is a growing general interest in applying this concept to large population-based studies, for which time or other resources to perform audiometry are not available [29,30].…”

“…Self-reporting always comes with the risk of misclassification bias, resulting in under-and overestimation. Age, sex and educational level, amongst other factors, are shown to be associated with identification of self-reported hearing loss [24,25,33] and objective hearing loss and are easily assessable in any situation [1,14,15,24,33,34]. We found age, sex and educational level to increase the ability of the question to identify hearing loss, with age being the most important factor by far.…”

Hearing impairment and the risk of neurodegenerative dementia: A longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort

“…Because middle-aged adults have more opportunities to participate in social communication and often have jobs, they could be more affected by impaired verbal communication. In contrast, older adults tend to be more accommodating and often do not perceive their hearing impairment 21 , 22 . Thus, older adults might be more protected than middle-aged adults from the social isolation and emotional problems due to hearing impairment.…”

Sensitivity and Specificity of Pure-Tone and Subjective Hearing Screenings Using Spanish-Language Questions

“…Additionally, Kamil et al (2015) found that older women and Hispanics with hearing loss were less likely to self-report hearing loss compared to other demographic groups with hearing loss. Choi et al (2019) , Kim et al (2017) , and Wang et al (2019) analyzed self-report data from Korean and Chinese population samples and found that women were more likely to overestimate their hearing loss as compared to men who were more likely to underestimate their hearing loss. Although the literature may not be conclusive on the effect of gender and culture on self-report of hearing loss, we still acknowledge this limitation of our study sample.…”