1998
DOI: 10.1007/s100960050140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancy between Results of a Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay Kit and Immunofluorescence Staining for Detection of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Antigen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using NPA for microbiological diagnosis in all children with symptoms of a lower respiratory tract infection like tachypnoe, wheezing or apnoic spells we believe that the great majority of cases are included. However, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay used in the present study could give both false positive and false negative results [9,11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using NPA for microbiological diagnosis in all children with symptoms of a lower respiratory tract infection like tachypnoe, wheezing or apnoic spells we believe that the great majority of cases are included. However, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay used in the present study could give both false positive and false negative results [9,11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were our own in-house Abbott TestPack RSV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunofluorescens (IF) staining performed in our reference laboratory at the Department of Microbiology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo [13,14]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%