1985
DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(85)90017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancies in vehicular crash injury reporting: Northeastern Ohio trauma study IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1988
1988
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies, however, estirnated system sensitivity using the independent case ascertainment method (47,107,(117)(118)(119)(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126)(127)(128)(129)(130)(131)(132)(133)(134)(135)(136). In this approach, special surveys or routinely collected data are used to independently estirnate the frequency of injury occurrence.…”
Section: Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the studies, however, estirnated system sensitivity using the independent case ascertainment method (47,107,(117)(118)(119)(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126)(127)(128)(129)(130)(131)(132)(133)(134)(135)(136). In this approach, special surveys or routinely collected data are used to independently estirnate the frequency of injury occurrence.…”
Section: Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• identify ail such injuries (133). When these records were matched with police reports, the sensitivity was 55%.…”
Section: Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the U.S., one of the earliest such efforts was reported by Barancik and Fife (1985), drawing from a probability sampling of emergency room visits to 42 hospitals in northeastern Ohio. The authors were able to identify police crash reports for only 55 percent of the patients treated for injuries received in a motor vehicle crash; among those hospitalized, 74 percent were matched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%