2016
DOI: 10.1515/folmed-2015-0040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrepancies between Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Fluorescein Angiography in Detecting Uveitic Macular Edema

Abstract: Fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography are highly sensitive methods used in detecting macular edema in patients with uveitis, but they might fail to be efficient in this if used independently. Optical coherence tomography is a more informative method, especially in diagnosing diffuse macular edema.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When used independently, there may be certain discrepancies in the detection of fluid. 18 Therefore, a combination of OCT and FA may provide highly precise, reproducible and comprehensive evaluation of the UME (both quantitative and qualitative) in eyes with uveitis.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used independently, there may be certain discrepancies in the detection of fluid. 18 Therefore, a combination of OCT and FA may provide highly precise, reproducible and comprehensive evaluation of the UME (both quantitative and qualitative) in eyes with uveitis.…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%