2011
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/729/1/l4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DISCOVERY OF STRONG IRON Kα EMITTING COMPTON THICK QUASARS AT z = 2.5 AND 2.9

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More quantitatively, the absorbed X-ray selected QSOs exhibit luminosity ratios in the range 0.3 L FIR /L AGN 5 (Stevens et al 2005;Vignali et al 2009;Gilli et al 2011;Feruglio et al 2011), supporting the view that they typically reach their large X-ray luminosity when star formation is still vigorous.…”
Section: Star Formation In High Redshift X-ray Selected Agns and Qsosmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…More quantitatively, the absorbed X-ray selected QSOs exhibit luminosity ratios in the range 0.3 L FIR /L AGN 5 (Stevens et al 2005;Vignali et al 2009;Gilli et al 2011;Feruglio et al 2011), supporting the view that they typically reach their large X-ray luminosity when star formation is still vigorous.…”
Section: Star Formation In High Redshift X-ray Selected Agns and Qsosmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the low S/N regime, it is hard to determine whether a highly obscured source is Compton-thick or -thin (see also the comparison of Compton-thick AGN identification results from different works by Castelló-Mor et al 2013). We note that some Comptonthick candidates identified by previous spectral analyses are classified as Compton-thin in this work, including sources 375 (Feruglio et al 2011, named BzK8608 therein), 551 (Comastri et al 2011, CXOCDFSJ033229.8-275106), 328 (Norman et al 2002;Comastri et al 2011, CXOCDFSJ033218.3-275055), 419 (Del Moro et al 2016, ID=23), 240 (Georgantopoulos et al 2013, XID=191), and 867 (Georgantopoulos et al 2013, XID=634). According to our spectral analysis, these sources are found to be Compton-thin but still highly obscured, with N H between 5.5 10 23 -1.1 10 24 cm −2 .…”
Section: Distribution Of N H Excluding Compton-thick Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…There are various reports in the literature on Compton thick AGN candidates in the CDFS using whole or part of the Chandra 4 Ms data (e.g., Norman et al 2002;Mainieri et al 2005;Tozzi et al 2006;Fiore et al 2008;Gilli et al 2011;Feruglio et al 2011;Luo et al 2011;Brightman & Ueda 2012;Fiore et al 2012). Some of them lie in the redshift range of our sample, although they are expectedly faint and just a few of them entered in our sample of relatively bright sources.…”
Section: X-ray Selection Of Heavily Obscured Agnmentioning
confidence: 90%