2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of potential natural dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors and their synergism with brequinar via integrated molecular docking, dynamic simulations and in vitro approach

Abstract: The critical function of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) in pyrimidine synthesis attracted a great interest throughout beyond decades. Inhibitors of human DHODH (hDHODH) have validated efficacy for remedy of many immunological diseases. Brequinar and leflunomide are examples of such compounds. However, most of such immunosuppressive medications suffer from a lot of side effects and accompanied by adverse metabolic disturbances and toxicities. So that, immunomodulation utilizing natural products received t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, stability study of protein-ligand complexes of LasI, LasR, CviR, PilY1, PilT, and RhlR with 1,8-cineole obtained by molecular docking study was carried out by means of 100 ns MD simulations. Mobility of 1,8-cineole with respect to active site residues of target proteins was numerically calculated by RMSD measurements (Khairy et al, 2022). As shown in Figure 10, RMSD values were measured for compound 1,8-cineole with LasI below 0.7 nm and mean 0.43 nm, with LasR below 0.5 nm and mean 0.32 nm, with CviR below 0.5 nm and mean 0.35 nm, with PilT below 0.8 nm and mean 0.64 nm, with PilY1 below 1.4 nm and mean 0.75 nm, with RhlR below 0.7 nm and mean 0.39 nm.…”
Section: Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, stability study of protein-ligand complexes of LasI, LasR, CviR, PilY1, PilT, and RhlR with 1,8-cineole obtained by molecular docking study was carried out by means of 100 ns MD simulations. Mobility of 1,8-cineole with respect to active site residues of target proteins was numerically calculated by RMSD measurements (Khairy et al, 2022). As shown in Figure 10, RMSD values were measured for compound 1,8-cineole with LasI below 0.7 nm and mean 0.43 nm, with LasR below 0.5 nm and mean 0.32 nm, with CviR below 0.5 nm and mean 0.35 nm, with PilT below 0.8 nm and mean 0.64 nm, with PilY1 below 1.4 nm and mean 0.75 nm, with RhlR below 0.7 nm and mean 0.39 nm.…”
Section: Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD simulation was performed for 150 ns in this study to demonstrate the stability of the apigenin and myristoleic acid complexes with α-glucosidase and α-amylase obtained from the molecular docking study . Fitting of apigenin to the backbone atoms of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, conformational changes of the ligand at the active site were analyzed by RMSD calculations . As shown in Figure A, the α-glucosidase active site of apigenin remained stable below 0.45 nm and had a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.39 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Fitting of apigenin to the backbone atoms of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, conformational changes of the ligand at the active site were analyzed by RMSD calculations. 34 As shown in Figure 7A, the α-glucosidase active site of apigenin remained stable below 0.45 nm and had a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.39 nm. As given in Figure 7B in the other MD simulation, apigenin and α-amylase were stable around 0.2 nm for the first 60 ns, fluctuating up to 0.8 nm between 60 and 75 nm, after which there were shifts but below 0.4 nm, and remained stable on average around 0.2 nm.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics (Md)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Depending on our previous study of the chemical makeup of 32 selected immunomodulatory plants, 2154 phytochemical constituents were obtained for compilation of an in-house database as illustrated in Table S3 . These plants were selected according to their traditionally known action to treat immune related disorders or based on prior in vivo, in vitro or clinical trials from literature review as mentioned in Khairy et al 73 and summarized briefly in Table 6 . Different resources including Dictionary of natural products ( http://dnp.chemnetbase.com/faces/chemical/ChemicalSearch.xhtml;jsessionid=0A16BF52515E734B15A96DCBAE7788B9 ), National Centre for Biotechnology Information's PubChem database ( https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ ), ChEMBL ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/ ) and Chemdraw software (CambridgeSoft Corporation, Cambridge, USA) were used to provide 2D structures of these compounds in (.sdf) format.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%