Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture - K-Cap 2001 2001
DOI: 10.1145/500742.500764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of ontologies from knowledge bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Maedche and Staab, there are as many ontology learning approaches as types of data sources [30]. We distinguish ontology learning approaches from texts, from dictionaries [31], from knowledge bases [32], from semi-structured schema [33] and relational data [34]. In this section, we are interested mainly in approaches related to ontology learning from web (including texts).…”
Section: Progress In Ontology Engineering Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Maedche and Staab, there are as many ontology learning approaches as types of data sources [30]. We distinguish ontology learning approaches from texts, from dictionaries [31], from knowledge bases [32], from semi-structured schema [33] and relational data [34]. In this section, we are interested mainly in approaches related to ontology learning from web (including texts).…”
Section: Progress In Ontology Engineering Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research work had been dedicated for building and maintaining ontologies: (a) ontology learning methodologies from dictionary, from text, from XML documents, or from knowledge base [6,10,17], (b) ontology merging methods of existing ontologies [14,13], (c) ontology re-engineering methods [8], and finally (d) ontology construction from scratch [7,6,9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Becker [17] used formal concept analysis for this task, in the context of document retrieval. In similar work, Suryanto [18] used lattices for inferring user interests. Also similar is the work of Moldovan [13] who addresses the problem of building richer models of people's interests by relying on knowledge elicitation from the user and taxonomic representation of computer terms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%