2010
DOI: 10.1021/ml100196d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of MK-5046, a Potent, Selective Bombesin Receptor Subtype-3 Agonist for the Treatment of Obesity

Abstract: We report the development and characterization of compound 22 (MK-5046), a potent, selective small molecule agonist of BRS-3 (bombesin receptor subtype-3). In pharmacological testing using diet-induced obese mice, compound 22 caused mechanism-based, dose-dependent reductions in food intake and body weight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ from findings with the GRP/NMB receptors whose binding doseinhibition curves are best-fitted only by a single binding-site model (Mantey et al, 1993;Jensen et al, 2008) because we found that BRS-3-receptor exists in both a high-affinity and low-affinity state. Our results are similar to the previous studies that demonstrated that the nonpeptide agonist MK-5046 and the peptide antagonist-Bantag-1 have high affinity for hBRS-3 and that MK-5046 did not interact with either hGRP-R or hNMB-R even in the micromolar range (Guan et al, 2010;Sebhat et al, 2011). Our results differ from findings previously reported with Bantag-1 in which the antagonist was found to interact with both hGRP-R and hNMB-R in the micromolar range (Guan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differ from findings with the GRP/NMB receptors whose binding doseinhibition curves are best-fitted only by a single binding-site model (Mantey et al, 1993;Jensen et al, 2008) because we found that BRS-3-receptor exists in both a high-affinity and low-affinity state. Our results are similar to the previous studies that demonstrated that the nonpeptide agonist MK-5046 and the peptide antagonist-Bantag-1 have high affinity for hBRS-3 and that MK-5046 did not interact with either hGRP-R or hNMB-R even in the micromolar range (Guan et al, 2010;Sebhat et al, 2011). Our results differ from findings previously reported with Bantag-1 in which the antagonist was found to interact with both hGRP-R and hNMB-R in the micromolar range (Guan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Peptide #1 had a more rapid onset and shorter duration of action for each. This difference was not due to a difference in stability with the two agonists, as previous studies had demonstrated that each is stable under incubation conditions at 37°C for at least 1 hour (Mantey et al, 1997;Sebhat et al, 2011;Reitman et al, 2012). Compared with previous studies that investigated the kinetics/duration of action of peptide and nonpeptide agonists, our results are similar to those with the CCK1-receptor nonpeptide agonist SR146131 (Bignon et al, 1999;Schaeffer et al, 2000), where the nonpeptide had a more prolonged duration of the action in stimulating [Ca 21 ] i when it was compared with an equally effective dose of the natural agonist CCK-8S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations