2000
DOI: 10.1007/10722280_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery of Class Relations in Exception Structured Knowledge Bases

Abstract: Abstract. Knowledge-based systems (KBS) are not necessarily based on a well-defined ontologies. In particular it is possible to build very successful KBS for classification problems, but where the classes or conclusions are entered by experts as free-text sentences with little constraint on textual consistency and little systematic organisation of the conclusions. This paper investigates how relations between such 'classes' may be discovered from existing knowledge bases. We have based our approach on KBS buil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique offered an alternative to labour-intensive specification of ontologies that combined rapid, incremental and manual KA using RDR with automatic generation of ontologies using FCA to enable reverse engineering of ontologies (Richards, 2004). Suryanto and Compton (2000) took this work further to allow learning of classification taxonomies and the relations of mutual-exclusivity and similarity between classes in addition to the subsumption relation provided by FCA.…”
Section: Variations Extensions and Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique offered an alternative to labour-intensive specification of ontologies that combined rapid, incremental and manual KA using RDR with automatic generation of ontologies using FCA to enable reverse engineering of ontologies (Richards, 2004). Suryanto and Compton (2000) took this work further to allow learning of classification taxonomies and the relations of mutual-exclusivity and similarity between classes in addition to the subsumption relation provided by FCA.…”
Section: Variations Extensions and Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%